InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Battistelli: unitary patent fee concern is exaggerated

Simon Crompton, Paris

Unitary patent fees will be confirmed “in 2014”, but it is impossible to be more precise than that, according to EPO President Benoît Battistelli. But he also claims that concern over fees is greatly exaggerated

BattistelliSpeaking to Managing IP in an interview at the IP Summit in Paris today, Battistelli (right) said: "People do not consider how constrained we are in setting fees. We have said that the unitary patent must be self-financing, on the one hand, but it must also be attractive to industry, on the other. The gap in between is pretty small."

Although Battistelli would not be pushed more on what the fees will be, he said: "They will be higher than many would hope, but lower than some might fear."

Preparation for the new work is going well, Battistelli said, with the EPO technically ready to start processing unitary patents today. "We are very relaxed about it. I don’t see the first patents being granted until the middle or end of 2015, so there is plenty of time. I don’t feel we need to set fees that soon either, given that timeframe."

In response to questions about EPO labour protests during the recent 40th anniversary celebrations, Battistelli said: "It is a tradition at the EPO. We are an independent body that sets its own rules – and those rules have generally been quite conservative. Changes such as the recent addition of Chinese prior art can cause some problems. But I’m determined to introduce reforms to working practices when needed. It is that drive for efficiency that will be the biggest contributor to lower fees for IP owners."

Battistelli spoke to Managing IP at the new three-day format of the IP Summit, in Paris. During a public presentation to attendees later, he said: "The experience of the EPO has shown that it is worth being both bold and optimistic. I hope we learn that lesson with the unitary patent."


Article Comments

The passage of this article on the EPO staff protests during the recent 40th anniversary celebrations is not only misleading but above all damaging for the EPO's acknowledged reputation for quality: NONE of the five grounds for strike notified by the staff to its President pertained in any way whatsoever to problems with Chinese prior art.

User Dec 11, 2013


Managing IP


ManagingIP profile

RT @tm4smallbiz: The oldest registered trademarks in the world. Nice blog post from @ZnakiTowarowe

Jan 23 2018 05:22 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Last month, the Brussels Court of Appeal decided that Aldi’s Buval Pilsner does not infringe InBev’s Jupiler Pilsne…

Jan 23 2018 03:19 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Motorola v Hytera: standard essential patents are to be considered by Australia’s Federal Court next year

Jan 23 2018 01:29 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog

null null null

null null null

End of Year 2017

Tribal sovereign immunity: Taking a wrecking ball to the IPR system

The lawyer behind Allergan’s controversial transfer of patents to a Native American tribe says others are “lining up to do deals”. But, Michael Loney asks, will the PTAB rule that sovereign immunity applies in these types of deals?

Most read articles