InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Battistelli: unitary patent fee concern is exaggerated



Simon Crompton, Paris


Unitary patent fees will be confirmed “in 2014”, but it is impossible to be more precise than that, according to EPO President Benoît Battistelli. But he also claims that concern over fees is greatly exaggerated

BattistelliSpeaking to Managing IP in an interview at the IP Summit in Paris today, Battistelli (right) said: "People do not consider how constrained we are in setting fees. We have said that the unitary patent must be self-financing, on the one hand, but it must also be attractive to industry, on the other. The gap in between is pretty small."

Although Battistelli would not be pushed more on what the fees will be, he said: "They will be higher than many would hope, but lower than some might fear."

Preparation for the new work is going well, Battistelli said, with the EPO technically ready to start processing unitary patents today. "We are very relaxed about it. I don’t see the first patents being granted until the middle or end of 2015, so there is plenty of time. I don’t feel we need to set fees that soon either, given that timeframe."

In response to questions about EPO labour protests during the recent 40th anniversary celebrations, Battistelli said: "It is a tradition at the EPO. We are an independent body that sets its own rules – and those rules have generally been quite conservative. Changes such as the recent addition of Chinese prior art can cause some problems. But I’m determined to introduce reforms to working practices when needed. It is that drive for efficiency that will be the biggest contributor to lower fees for IP owners."

Battistelli spoke to Managing IP at the new three-day format of the IP Summit, in Paris. During a public presentation to attendees later, he said: "The experience of the EPO has shown that it is worth being both bold and optimistic. I hope we learn that lesson with the unitary patent."


Comments






Article Comments

The passage of this article on the EPO staff protests during the recent 40th anniversary celebrations is not only misleading but above all damaging for the EPO's acknowledged reputation for quality: NONE of the five grounds for strike notified by the staff to its President pertained in any way whatsoever to problems with Chinese prior art.

User Dec 11, 2013

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

Jaguar Land Rover to trademark Defender design to see off rivals https://t.co/9XxH3FwZID via @FT

Sep 22 2017 08:55 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@patentassertion @Mathys_Squire Would you be interested in writing a follow up looking at trends in other jurisdictions, eg DE, FR, IT & NL?

Sep 21 2017 04:25 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @MarquesIP: At #marques17 Dimitris Botis of @EU_IPO & Simon Malynicz of @3NewSquare discuss the EUTM changes coming on October 1 #EUIPO0…

Sep 21 2017 08:53 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


null null null

September 2017

How UK IP firms hope to survive Brexit

The UK’s departure from the EU threatens to disrupt IP practice in the country – and patent and trade mark firms are already taking steps to mitigate the potential damage. James Nurton reports



Most read articles

Supplements