Managing Intellectual Property

Where to win: patent-friendly courts revealed

01 September 2010

Multinational companies are increasingly finding themselves litigating in multiple jurisdictions. Michael Elmer and Stacy Lewis reveal findings from Finnegan's Global IP Project to help IP counsel choose the best first-strike forum


Market globalisation and electronic commerce are pushing patent disputes beyond country boundaries and landing them, sometimes contemporaneously, in multiple countries with varying legal systems and consequent varying results. Patent owners and alleged infringers face a complicated labyrinth when mapping out a global strategy for IP litigation.

Although patent enforcement remains national in nature, business considerations often incline to global dispute resolution, particularly when they encounter the same competitors in multiple countries. It is important to consider, therefore, that the result in the first suit brought often has a large impact on the overall global effort. Legally, of course, that first result has no bearing on later suits in different countries. But in practice, business managers seek certainty, and the outcome of litigation in one jurisdiction often influences settlement negotiations in other jurisdictions.

An early win, therefore, is crucial, whether for the patentee or the alleged infringer. In the Global IP...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


February 2012

Patent survey 2012

Managing IP ranks the leading patent firms around the world



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements