On October 25 1995 a Polish entrepreneur Tomasz Bednarski conducting business under the company name Optyk Tomek in Warsaw applied for registration of a word trade mark Optometrysta ("optometrist") in class 42 for services such as "examination of eye refraction, selection of spectacles for individual needs, selection of contact lenses for individual needs, selection of telescopic spectacles for individual needs". On August 4 1998, the trade mark was registered by the Polish Patent Office under number R-104424.
In February 2007, the President of the Executive Board of the Polish Society of Optometry and Optics informed the Polish Patent Office that the word optometrysta is a common profession name, used at least since 1983. In March 2007, the request for invalidation of the trade mark was filed by the President of the Patent Office, based on claims that the registration was granted against Article 7(2) of the former Polish Trade Mark Law of 1985 (the Law on Trade Marks of January 31 1985, Journal of Laws of 1985, Number 5, item 15 with later amendments):
- The only signs that shall be eligible for registration as trade marks are those that have sufficient distinctiveness in ordinary economic activity.
- A sign shall not have sufficient distinctiveness if it simply constitutes a generic designation of the product, if it simply makes a statement as to the properties, quality, number, amount, weight, price, purpose, manufacturing process, time or place of production, composition, function or usefulness of the goods or any similar information that does not enable the origin of the goods to be determined.
This was in connection with Article 167(2) of the Law of June 30 2000 – the Law on Industrial Property – published in Journal of Laws of 2001, Number 49, item 508, uniform text of June 13 2003, and Journal of Laws Number 119, item 1117, with later amendments:
The General Public Prosecutor of the Republic of Poland or the President of the Patent Office may, in the public interest, request that the right of protection for a trade mark be invalidated or intervene in an invalidation action already pending.
According to the President of the Polish Patent Office, the trade mark Optometrysta is simply the name of a profession. The World Council of Optometry defines optometry as: "A healthcare profession that is autonomous, educated, and regulated (licensed/registered), and optometrists are the primary healthcare practitioners of the eye and visual system who provide comprehensive eye and vision care, which includes refraction and dispensing, detection/diagnosis and management of disease in the eye, and the rehabilitation of conditions of the visual system."
In 1999 the profession was entered on to the list of professions performed in Poland, which is kept by the Ministry of Labour and the President of the Central Statistics Office.
During the hearings at the Patent Office, the owner of the mark declared that he performed the services under the mark, and according to his knowledge, the mark had not been earlier registered in the name of any other party. In view of this, he decided to apply for registration of the mark with the aim of obtaining financial benefit.
The Adjudicative Board of the Polish Patent Office, by virtue of its decision of May 30 2007, file Number Sp 141/07, invalidated the trade mark right. The Patent Office argued that before the date of filing an application for registration of the sign as a trade mark, it functioned as the name of a profession in the optical industry. At the date of invalidation, the subject mark does not have any distinctive character, and therefore no one should be granted the exclusive protection right for the mark, and at the same time a monopoly thereto.
Bednarski lodged a complaint with the District Administrative Court in Warsaw (decisions of the Patent Office are subject to complaints with the Administrative Court). He questioned procedural aspects of the Patent Office's decision, and argued that the Patent Office should base the request for invalidation on Article 31 of the Law on Trade Marks:
The request for annulment of a right deriving from registration of a trade mark may be filed within five years of the date of registration. After the expiry of that period, such request may only be filed in respect of an owner who has obtained a registration in bad faith.
According to Bednarski, the term for filing this request terminated in 2004, and the Patent Office had not made reference to bad faith action in order to file the request for invalidation after expiry of this term. The District Administrative Court rejected the trade mark owner's arguments. The Court, in its decision of December 13 2007, file Number VI SA/Wa 1708/07, held that the five-year statutory period for filing the request for invalidation had not expired before the entry into force of the new Law on Industrial Property, which provided different regulations and opened new opportunities to file the request for invalidation. These regulations are set forth under Chapter 6 of the Law on Industrial Property entitled "Invalidation and Lapse of the Right of Protection for a Trade Mark". Apart from exceptional circumstances specified therein, the legislature has waived the deadline for requesting invalidation proceedings. As of August 22 2001, no time limit will restrict the possibility of requesting invalidation of the right of protection. Thus, after August 22 2002, the President of the Patent Office, acting in the public interest, may at any time request the invalidation of the right of protection that was granted against the law.
Bednarski filed a cassation complaint with the Supreme Administrative Court. However his motion was dismissed by virtue of a decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of January 20 2009, file number II GSK 642/08. The decision is final.
 |
| Tomasz Rychlicki |
Patpol
162J Nowoursynowska Str.
02-776 Warsaw
Poland
Postal address
PO Box 168, 00-950 Warsaw, Poland
Tel: +48 22 644 96 57 / 96 59; +48 22 644 96 68 / 97 69
Fax: +48 22 644 96 00 / 44 02
patpol@patpol.com.pl
www.patpol.com.pl