Managing Intellectual Property

Should I choose civil or criminal remedies to protect my trade marks in China?

01 November 2008

"I work for a global company doing business in China. We have a problem with counterfeiters and I am not sure what is the best way to enforce my trade marks." Responses from a lawyer, in-house counsel and investigator

The lawyer

There are three channels to protect your intellectual property rights in China: administrative, civil and criminal enforcement. The administrative raid is quick and cheap, and the Administration for Industry and Commerce (AIC) or Technical Supervision Bureau (TSB) has the authority to seize infringing products, but not to detain suspects. More and more AICs are asking IP owners to provide notarised and legalised powers of attorney when complaints are filed, which makes administrative enforcement more difficult. An administrative fine is usually regarded as part of the cost of doing business by infringers. However, administrative enforcement makes sense because it allows IP owners to build up a database on repeat offenders. Suspended sentences do not apply to repeat offenders in criminal proceedings according to the judicial interpretations on criminal liability against IP crimes issued in 2007 by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate.

Civil action is becoming...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


February 2012

Patent survey 2012

Managing IP ranks the leading patent firms around the world



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements