JULY / AUGUST 2008
LATEST NEWS
-
Utah cybersquatting bill could go national March 16, 2010
-
Blog roundup: Reform roadblocks, wrinkle patents and policing the Pirate Bay March 15, 2010
-
Icann decision brings new gTLDs closer March 15, 2010
-
Obama nominates IP-savvy judge to Federal Circuit March 15, 2010
-
Compulsory licence alarm for patent owners in India March 15, 2010
-
Tackling backlogs is not the answer, say patent users March 15, 2010
-
Icann Board backs TM protection proposals March 12, 2010
-
PCT is the answer to USPTO backlog – Stoll March 12, 2010
Avoid competition problems in China
China's long-awaited Anti-Monopoly law comes into effect on August 1, but its impact on IP owners is far from certain, explain Kirstie Nicholson and Zirou Liu
| One-minute read |
| China's Anti-Monopoly law was promulgated on August 31 last year and is due to come into effect on August 1 this year. As is usual in China, the wording of the law, including the sections that deal with IP, is quite vague. But the implementing regulations promised when the law was passed have not yet appeared. This has led to a lot of uncertainty among foreign businesses in China, which culminated in rumours at the end of June that SIPO had already begun an investigation into monopolistic practices by Microsoft. SIPO swiftly denied any involvement. This article looks closely at the wording of the Law itself and also at the EU precedents that may provide clues as to how China might enforce its Anti-Monopoly Law. |
Intellectual property grants a monopoly that enables the right holder to prevent others from manufacturing, distributing, selling or using products that make use of the relevant intellectual property. Competition law, including China's Anti-Monopoly Law (AML), on the other hand, aims to prevent a monopoly situation and to safeguard fair market competition. However, IP and competition laws do also have certain common aims, including the promotion of innovation and the protection of consumers. It is therefore possible for IP rights to exist within the permitted boundaries of competition laws; however, where actions are taken that go beyond the legitimate protection of IP, competition concerns may arise.
The rest of this article is available to subscribers and active trialists only.
Subscribe today for full access to this article. Alternatively take a free trial, giving you access to the current issue's contents*.
Interested in previewing the Managing IP's new service Managing Internet IP? Click here.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in below to access the rest of this article.
*excludes some surveys and articles.