Russia's Part IV problems


Last year Russia overhauled its IP legislation. Managing IP hosted a roundtable in Moscow to discuss the changes

PO - Does Part IV amount to a step forward or a step back for IP in Russia?

VO - I wouldn't put this question as categorically as a step forward or back. Part IV has been passed, and today we should look at how we will implement it, will it even be possible to implement it and what should be done to amend the obvious mistakes that exist in the code.

I believe these problems exist mainly because it was passed too quickly and specialists were not consulted. Also at the later stage of discussions when a working group was formed it included only those people who worked on the draft - I was included only at the very last minute. Issues on means of individualization [the term used in Part IV to denote trade and service marks, appellations of origin, trade names and commercial designations] were not discussed at all,...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements