-
Sponsored by Hanol IP & LawMin Son of Hanol IP & Law considers the use of a re-filing strategy against non-use cancellation -
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP AttorneysRachna Bakhru of RNA Technology and IP Attorneys examines the law surrounding the ‘right to publicity’ in relation to the Olympics
-
Sponsored by Tilleke & GibbinsKhin Myo Myo Aye of Tilleke & Gibbins describes how the extension of the TRIPS transition period for least developed countries will impact companies operating in Myanmar
-
Sponsored by Patrinos & KilimirisEvangelia Sioumala of Patrinos & Kilimiris looks at a recent judgment from the Athens Administrative Court of First Instance that compared conceptually and visually similar images
-
Sponsored by AJ ParkAJ Park explores a recent case which emphasises the importance of submitting reliable evidence in invalidation proceedings, even where proceedings are undefended
-
Sponsored by Daniel LawRoberta Arantes of Daniel Law looks at how the Brazilian legal landscape has responded to shifts in the concept of branding and its related levels of protection
-
Sponsored by Tilleke & GibbinsKannicha Wungmuthitakul of Tilleke & Gibbins considers a case in Thailand that addresses the registration of a game title as a trademark
-
Sponsored by Lifang & PartnersYan Zhang and Xiao Wang of Lifang & Partners consider why private prosecution should be considered part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy in China
-
Sponsored by Bird & BirdJae Park of Bird & Bird takes note of the busy period for the Patents Court in the UK and considers the possibilities of ‘jumping the queue’
-
Sponsored by Tilleke & GibbinsTu Anh Tran and Duc Anh Tran of Tilleke & Gibbins explain why strong criminal provisions on trade secrets in Vietnam are necessary
-
Sponsored by DEQI Intellectual Property Law CorporationYanling Zhou of DEQI Intellectual Property presents a case study to depict how an applicant should seek to respond to an office action of an obvious substantive defect
-
Sponsored by Shiga International Patent OfficeKenji Tanaka of Shiga International Patent Office conducts a statistical analysis of the effectiveness of arguments for inventive step in the Japan Patent Office examination
