-
Sponsored by Shiga International Patent OfficeKenji Tanaka of Shiga International Patent Office conducts a statistical analysis of the effectiveness of arguments for inventive step in the Japan Patent Office examination
-
Sponsored by Maiwald Intellectual PropertyAnnelie Wünsche and Stefanie Parchmann of Maiwald discuss double patenting before the EPO
-
Sponsored by Obhan & AssociatesIn the second part of a two-part interview, Essenese Obhan of Obhan & Associates talks to Managing IP about how his firm remains poised to assist clients in India’s evolving IP environment
-
Sponsored by Obhan & AssociatesIn a two-part interview, Essenese Obhan of Obhan & Associates talks to Managing IP about how the introduction of specialised IP benches at the Delhi High Court can improve efficiency and deliver justice
-
Sponsored by Gorodissky & PartnersVladimir Biriulin of Gorodissky & Partners explains why the patent office and the chamber were not satisfied with an applicant’s attempts to trademark a blue bottle
-
Sponsored by ABE & PartnersTakanori Abe of Abe & Partners considers the findings of a study into the increasing importance of standard essential patents and their licensing in Japan
-
Sponsored by Bugnion SpAMarco Lissandrini of Bugnion likens the decision in G1/19 to a round of golf, explaining the three-step pattern of reasoning to assess inventiveness
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersUğur Aktekin and Begüm Soydan of Gün and Partners explain why the Court of Cassation’s decision has evoked a mixed reaction from trademark filers
-
Sponsored by OLIVARESDiego Ballesteros of OLIVARES examines the evolving law of declaring trademarks in Mexico
-
Sponsored by ABE & PartnersTakanori Abe of Abe & Partners takes a closer look at how the Japanese government’s approach to the strategic acquisition and utilisation of SEPs will change
-
Sponsored by Vivien Chan & CoExperts from Vivien Chan & Co report on significant developments from the IP world across China and the Asia-Pacific
-
Sponsored by AJ ParkAJ Park explains the key takeaways from a recent case involving trademark disclaimers