Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 614 results that match your search.614 results
  • The importance of both brands and innovation is forcing IP to the top of the agenda in acquisitions, transfers and takeovers. Simon Crompton picks five examples from the past year
  • Top-rated firms in Argentina, Brazil, the Caribbean, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and all the US categories
  • Austria PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Sonn & Partner Tier 2 Beer & Partner Kopecky & Schwarz Tier 3 Patentanwalt Dr Thomas M Haffner Patentanwälte Puchberger, Berger & Partner Patentanwälte Schütz und Partner Torggler & Hofinger Tier 4 Barger, Piso & Partner Patentanwaltskanzlei Wildhack & Jellinek
  • Under the patent marking statute, a party is "entitled to damages from the time when it either began marking its products in compliance with section 287 (a) or when it actually notified [the infringer] of its infringement, whichever is earlier." (Am Med Sys, Inc v Med Eng'g Corp [Fed Cir 1993]). Section 287 (a) provides:
  • Top trade mark firms in Asia ranked for prosecution and contentious work. Includes tables for overseas firms in key jurisdictions
  • Top patent firms in Asia ranked for prosecution and contentious work. Includes tables for overseas firms in key jurisdictions.
  • By statute, a patent holder, if successful in litigation, is awarded "damages adequate to compensate for the infringement but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention." (35 USC §284 [2006]; Georgia-Pacific Corp v US Plywood Corp [SDNY 1970]). A reasonable royalty calculation involves determination of the royalty rate and royalty base.
  • MIP's annual survey of the leading IP firms covers 60 jurisdictions this year, and is the result of five months of research among IP professionals worldwide. James Nurton introduces the first part of the results, and explains how the tables have been compiled
  • After five months of research, MIP can now unveil the IP survey 2005, listing the leading firms in 57 jurisdictions. The first part, published here, provides a guide to the leading patent firms worldwide. James Nurton explains the new methodology and introduces the results