Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,210 results that match your search.22,210 results
  • Sam Mamudi, New York
  • Europe's highest court has set back Dutch company Libertel's bid to register the colour orange for its telecommunications business in a decision on May 6.
  • The Hatch-Waxman Act in the US represented a careful balance of interests between the generic and brand name pharmaceutical manufacturers. William Feiler and Paula Wittmayer examine the Safe Harbor exemption and the challenges it represents to the biotech industry
  • The Harvard oncomouse drew world attention to the issue of patentability of life forms. Pierre-André Dubois and Kate McCallie explore the divergent approaches of patent authorities in the US, Canada and the EU
  • Every company has external counsel, but in-house lawyers all have different ways of working with their private practice counterparts. Sam Mamudi talks to four trade mark chiefs to learn how they do it
  • Cathy Garner spearheads the newly-established Centre for the Management of IP in Health R&D (MIHR), an international non-governmental organization based in London but with plans for offices in Asia, Africa, Europe and North America. As MIHR's inaugural CEO, Garner will oversee its mission to improve public health in developing countries through effective IP management. She tells Ingrid Hering about MIHR’s objectives
  • The frictions between the laws regulating the ownership and exercise of IP rights and anti-competitive agreements are known and long-standing. What is less widely understood is the extent to which this situation will change following recent reforms to UK and EU competition law, explains Guy Lougher
  • Trade marks that include a design may suffer variations during the time they are used. This occurs due to modernization imposed by fashion. Not even well-known marks are exempt from periodical updating, even when their essential characteristics stay the same.
  • The Korean Patent Act Article 42 (3) provides that the detailed description of an invention shall state the purpose, construction, and "effect" of the invention in such a manner that it may easily be carried out by a person skilled in the art. Thus, the description of the "effect" of the invention in the specification is mandatory under the Korean Patent Law.