Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Search results for

There are 21,733 results that match your search.21,733 results
  • eagar-may03.jpg
    Lessons in obviousness in Australia
    The judgment in Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm gives valuable guidance about the ‘obvious to try’ doctrine to the owners of Australian patents. Barry Eagar argues that the judges stressed the importance of Australian case law over its English equivalent
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • rashidmanesh-may03.jpg
    Protect your IP rights from insolvency
    What are the risks for licensees when a licensor becomes insolvent? Hamid Rashidmanesh, David Naylor and Adam A Lewis compare procedures under US and English law, and provide some tips on how to minimize risk
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • vassallo-may03.jpg
    Supreme Court tightens trade mark law
    The US Supreme Court's ruling in the Victoria's Secret dilution case is the latest example of the trend to rein in IP rights. Edward Vassallo and Tila Duhaime examine what the ruling means for trade mark holders
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • sears-may03.jpg
    Patent invalidity defence survives
    Pandrol USA LP v Airboss Railway Products Inc, 65 USPQ 2d 1985 (Fed Cir 2003) deals with several interesting questions of jurisdiction and waiver under US law.
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • lougher-may03.jpg
    How the UK Enterprise Act affects your IP
    The frictions between the laws regulating the ownership and exercise of IP rights and anti-competitive agreements are known and long-standing. What is less widely understood is the extent to which this situation will change following recent reforms to UK and EU competition law, explains Guy Lougher
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • vanpratt-may03.jpg
    Modification of a registered mark
    Trade marks that include a design may suffer variations during the time they are used. This occurs due to modernization imposed by fashion. Not even well-known marks are exempt from periodical updating, even when their essential characteristics stay the same.
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • lyu-may03.jpg
    How to describe medicinal use inventions
    The Korean Patent Act Article 42 (3) provides that the detailed description of an invention shall state the purpose, construction, and "effect" of the invention in such a manner that it may easily be carried out by a person skilled in the art. Thus, the description of the "effect" of the invention in the specification is mandatory under the Korean Patent Law.
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • Rules of engagement for IP litigation
    More and more international companies are launching IP litigation in China. Before they do so, they should be aware of what is and what isn’t allowed in a Chinese courtroom, as Judge Xu, a prominent IP judge in Shanghai, explains in an exclusive interview with MIP
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • steele-may03.jpg
    A bitter affair
    The English Court of Appeal (CoA) has handed down what could, in time, be seen as a watershed decision on the registrability as trade marks of words and phrases that have descriptive connotations, messages and/or meanings.
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
  • hughes-may03.jpg
    Surrendering words to the EU
    Justin Hughes, assistant professor of law, Cardozo School of Law, US
    Managing IP Correspondent, April 30 2003
Previous
1
...
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
...
2173
Next