Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,317 results that match your search.22,317 results
  • The revised Customs legislation prescribes the conditions under which the Customs Administration of Croatia can take measures against goods where there is justifiable suspicion that they violate IP rights. It also details the procedures to implement Customs measures in such cases.
  • The National Copyright Administration of the PRC (NCAC) plans to introduce a black list system to help crack down on online copyright infringement.
  • In one of the most significant Australian decisions for many years on obviousness, the Australian High Court in Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 21 has increased the difficulty of striking down patents for obviousness.
  • Danone's spat with joint venture partner Wahaha has highlighted the risks of investing in China. Peter Ollier examines what went wrong
  • The House of Lords, the UK's highest court, is to hear arguments in a controversial dispute over a stent patent
  • Recent developments in two long-running cases in Australia have fuelled the debate about IP owners' ability to register and enforce colour trade marks in the country
  • The value of fake goods traded internationally could be as high as $200 billion according to a preliminary report published by the OECD on June 4
  • The Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan rendered a final decision in April 2007 in a dispute between the World Trade Centers Association, Inc (WTCA) and Kaohsiung World Trade Center Co Ltd (KWTC), a local company. In the case, KWTC's use of the term World Trade Center and its Chinese equivalent as part of its company name was held by the Court to be a deceptive or obviously unfair action that would affect trade order, and was therefore in violation of Article 24 of the Fair Trade Act. The Court said that, although the trade mark registration owned by WTCA in Taiwan is the Chinese equivalent for Taipei World Trade Center, the three words World Trade Center contained in the mark are sufficiently distinctive to be a source identifier. The Court further indicated that, while KWTC's use of World Trade Center as part of its company name does not constitute trade mark infringement, such use would mislead the public into thinking that KWTC is affiliated with WTCA and would therefore engender marketplace confusion. KWTC was accordingly ordered to stop using World Trade Center and its Chinese equivalent as part of its company name and to change its Chinese company name registered with the authorities.
  • The debate concerning the need to clarify the secrecy legislation surrounding joint research projects has been going on for several years in Sweden without resulting in any legal amendments to safeguard secrecy. However, at the same time as the Seventh EU Research Framework Programme is now in force, the debate has finally reached a definitive solution.
  • The Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 2007 (TMA) was passed on January 22 2007. The TMA, Trade Marks (Amendment) Rules 2007 (TMR) and Trade Marks (International Registration) (Amendment) Rules 2007 has taken effect on July 2 2007. Highlights of the amendments are summarized below.