Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,213 results that match your search.22,213 results
  • The National Copyright Administration of the PRC (NCAC) plans to introduce a black list system to help crack down on online copyright infringement.
  • Unlike some jurisdictions which allow any person to file a patent application, Canadian law provides that a patent application can only be made in the name of the inventor or a person who derives rights from the inventor. Until recently, the Patent Rules required that, in order to satisfy the Commissioner of Patents as to entitlement to file the application, the applicant was required to record evidence establishing a chain of title from the inventor. Under the new rules, effective June 2 2007, it is no longer necessary to record such evidence. The applicant is instead required to file a declaration setting forth the basis of its entitlement, normally within 15 months from the priority date or three months from the date of entry into the national phase. However, it is important to note that the underlying statutory requirements governing the entitlement to file a patent application have not changed. The changes in the rules relate to the requirements sufficient to satisfy the Commissioner to allow an application to proceed. Generally, it is still advisable at least to obtain a written assignment or other acknowledgement from the inventor that the applicant does indeed own the rights in the invention, and given the minimal cost, preferably to continue to record that document against the application order to minimize the risk of any future challenges to the ownership or validity of the resulting patent by ensuring that there is a clear chain of title from the original inventor to the current owner.
  • Technological advances are putting copyright law under pressure in India. Poorvi Chothani assesses where the courts are likely to draw the line
  • Attorneys from Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo and Google tried to "diffuse some of the emotional issues" to do with internet advertising last month
  • The boom in mergers, acquisition and private equity investment puts the onus on investors to carry out comprehensive IP due diligence. Tamsen Valoir provides a practical 10-point plan covering the most important questions to ask
  • After the Thai public health ministry said it would issue a compulsory licence over a patent held by Merck, the Brazilian government has followed suit
  • Under US trade mark law, the USPTO may invalidate a trade mark registration or refuse to register a trade mark application based on the premise that the underlying filing contains false statements. The risk of invoking this penalty typically arises when a trade mark owner signs the required declaration that the mark at issue is in use on or in connection with all of the goods and services listed in the application/registration when, in fact, the mark may be used on only some of the goods or for some of the services.
  • Ersin Dereligil of Destek Patent Inc outlines Turkey's patent regime and highlights recent efforts to bring it up to European standards
  • A recent case addressed what happens when an employer and employee dispute who owns an invention. We contrast the UK, German and Japanese approaches
  • Recent cases in the US and Europe may make international arbitration a more attractive option in international IP disputes. Alan M Anderson and Christopher A Young explain why, and examine how arbitration can be effective for both parties