Search results for

The Indonesian Supreme Court recently declared Prestone to be a well-known mark. The case should give much-needed confidence to foreign investors in the country, say Gladys Mirandah and Saritha Bhanu of Patrick Mirandah Co

Carlos Pacheco of Hoet Pelaez Castillo & Duque navigates through the legislation providing protection for biotechnology innovation in Venezuela

India has introduced a range of new administrative, legislative and judicial measures to make life easier for IP owners and their legal advisers. Sonal Shukla of Anand and Anand outlines the developments

Heriberto López of Becerril, Coca & Becerril, SC, argues that there is an important distinction, when judging patentability, between what is obvious and what is logical, and considers the lessons learned from the US Supreme Court's recent KSR opinion

A new law implementing Chile's obligations under its Free Trade Agreement with the US is likely to be enacted by the end of the year. Rodrigo León provides a guide, and looks at the practical changes the law will make

With many updates to existing laws already implemented, and further changes to come, Dianne Daley and Nicole Foga of Foga Daley & Co argue that Jamaica offers a bright future for IP owners

A new amendment takes IP legislation in the wrong direction, yet new Customs laws represent a step forward for rights owners in Argentina. Carlos O Mitelman and Daniel R Zuccherino of Obligado & Cia explain

Following some major changes in IP in Latin America, correspondents from member firms of the Affinitas alliance review recent important developments in the key markets of Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru

Patent law reform has garnered a lot of attention recently and there has been extensive media coverage about various patent law reform proposals. There are, however, several statutes and other rules that govern patent cases and, an appropriate question to be asked is "What exactly are the 'laws' that are potentially going to be reformed?"

Franchising is one of the more popular modes of going into business in the Philippines, whether small, medium sized, or large. They are easy to set up and the franchised business has a built-in support system, and some goodwill attached to it. Because almost all franchise agreements involve a bundle of intellectual property rights, prior to January 1 1998, registration of this type of agreement was mandatory. After that date, registration became voluntary and enforceable in the Philippines, provided it complied with the provisions of the IP Code. The signatories to the registered agreement are certainly the real parties in interest, but in Pepsico Inc doing business in the name and style Pepsico Restaurants International v Emerald Pizza Inc (GR No 153059) promulgated by the Supreme Court on August 14 2007, the Court declared that Pepsico Inc, who was not a party to the franchise agreement, was a real party in interest. The case facts are as follows: