Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,213 results that match your search.22,213 results
  • A new amendment takes IP legislation in the wrong direction, yet new Customs laws represent a step forward for rights owners in Argentina. Carlos O Mitelman and Daniel R Zuccherino of Obligado & Cia explain
  • Following some major changes in IP in Latin America, correspondents from member firms of the Affinitas alliance review recent important developments in the key markets of Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru
  • Patent law reform has garnered a lot of attention recently and there has been extensive media coverage about various patent law reform proposals. There are, however, several statutes and other rules that govern patent cases and, an appropriate question to be asked is "What exactly are the 'laws' that are potentially going to be reformed?"
  • Franchising is one of the more popular modes of going into business in the Philippines, whether small, medium sized, or large. They are easy to set up and the franchised business has a built-in support system, and some goodwill attached to it. Because almost all franchise agreements involve a bundle of intellectual property rights, prior to January 1 1998, registration of this type of agreement was mandatory. After that date, registration became voluntary and enforceable in the Philippines, provided it complied with the provisions of the IP Code. The signatories to the registered agreement are certainly the real parties in interest, but in Pepsico Inc doing business in the name and style Pepsico Restaurants International v Emerald Pizza Inc (GR No 153059) promulgated by the Supreme Court on August 14 2007, the Court declared that Pepsico Inc, who was not a party to the franchise agreement, was a real party in interest. The case facts are as follows:
  • This year has seen Malaysia experience a positive whirlwind as far as IP rights are concerned. The deployment of specialist tracking dogs to combat software piracy, relentless raids conducted by authorities in their quest to curb piracy, the Prime Minister's declaration of a national IP day on April 27 2007; these are among the very many developments that bear testimony to Malaysia's serious approach to the protection and enforcement of IP rights.
  • Protection for IP rights in the Dominican Republic is much better than it used to be, thanks to a reorganized registry, effective Customs and efficient courts. Wendy Diaz discusses the latest developments and explains how they can help rights owners
  • The Croatian Parliament has enacted amendments to the Trade Mark Law, some of which went into effect on July 31 2007.
  • In the Kenya High Court case Mohan Meakin Ltd v Mohan Meakin (Kenya) Ltd and London Distillers Kenya) Ltd, the Indian brewing and distillery giant seeks to restrain the defendants from using and/or asserting ownership of the trade marks Old Monk and Meakin Rum following disposal of the plaintiff's shares in the first defendant in 2001.
  • The Canadian Trade-marks Office has issued a Practice Notice, effective August 15 2007, stating that the Registrar will "generally no longer require an applicant for registration of a trade-mark to enter disclaimers pursuant to section 35 of the" Trade-marks Act. The Office will, however, continue to accept voluntary disclaimers. Any outstanding disclaimer requests can be overcome by referring to the change in disclaimer practice regardless of whether the request was made prior to the effective date of the notice.
  • James Nurton, London