Article 368 of the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure reads: "a party may move the court for an order for persevering any evidence that may be destroyed or its use in court may become infeasible, or with the consent of the opposing party; where necessary, a party who has legal interests in ascertaining the status quo of a matter or object may move for expert testimony, inspection or preserving of documentary evidence". This stipulation, aimed at providing the right holder with an effective tool to secure and preserve evidence so as to more readily fulfil the burden of proof, was recently invoked by the IP Court in the hearing of a motion for preservation of evidence filed prior to a possible utility model patent infringement lawsuit.