Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,213 results that match your search.22,213 results
  • Ghyo Sun Park and Seong Don Hwang of Shin & Kim scrutinise the new non-practicing entities
  • The effects of this year’s top 10 cases will be more wide ranging than ever before. Managing IP’s team of journalists tells the stories behind the trials
  • What happens when your patent application is rejected? Hoon Chang and Dong-Jae Lee of Central International Law Firm outline the possibilities
  • Un Ho Kim and Young Sun Jung of Lee & Ko discuss recent Supreme Court decisions governing patentability of pharmaceutical inventions
  • The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office has, since January 1 2010, adopted an accelerated examination procedure for patent applications. According to the procedure, an applicant may, after the filing of a petition for substantive examination, request expedited examination of an application based on a foreign counterpart application that has been allowed or in which a search report has been received, or based on commercial use.
  • The protection and assertion of IP rights is perhaps as important as their acquisition. While there has been a recent spurt in the number of trade mark registrations, infringement has also been on the rise. A recent decision of the High Court of Delhi in Cadila Healthcare v Diat Foods (India) highlights yet another attempt by a company to safeguard its brand.
  • Article 2-(1) of the Korean Patent Act defines an "invention" as the highly advanced creation of a technical idea utilising the law of nature. Whether a patent application utilises the law of nature is determined by considering all claims. Partially utilising the laws of nature is not enough and any such invention would not be patentable.
  • On August 26 2010, the State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) promulgated the Measures for Registration of Patent Pledge, replacing the Interim Measures for Administering the Registration of Patent Pledge Contract of September 19 1996. The new measures came into effect on October 1 2010.
  • The EPO rule amendments predicted in our previous briefing article have recently been announced by the Administrative Council of the EPO.
  • The Federal Court of Canada recently issued a landmark decision regarding patent eligibility, holding that business methods can be patented in appropriate circumstances.