Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 13,023 results that match your search.13,023 results
  • The INTA recognizes that trade mark owners require a truly global organization to represent them, and is taking steps to increase its international profile. Ingrid Hering speaks to Kathryn Barrett Park about the challenges ahead for the Association
  • Dickerson M Downing and Kathleen E McCarthy, of Morgan & Finnegan, LLP in New York, review trade mark practice in the year 2000
  • Antony Taubman, head, WIPO traditional knowledge (global issues) division
  • Research is underway into patenting treatments for the Sars virus. But patent systems are not the same everywhere, especially where living organisms are concerned. Researchers need to be aware of the differences, warns Aaradhana Sadasivam
  • This year's changes to prior art disclosure requirements in Australia ease the burden on patent applicants. But, warns Mark Roberts, applicants still need to examine carefully what and how much they submit
  • Stéphanie Bodoni, London
  • When the world's richest man hires the architect of the world's most lucrative licensing schedule, the international IP community takes notice. Sam Mamudi visited Microsoft's Seattle headquarters to learn more about Marshall Phelps's plans for the software leader and his views on the IP system
  • Applicants not familiar with all the particularities of the European patent system are often surprised by the repeated requests of their European representatives to indicate support for the wording of every new or amended claim to be submitted to the European Patent Office (EPO). At the same time, strong feelings often overwhelm European patent attorneys when, during examination, they receive a pile of brand new claims from overseas colleagues with the cheerful remark that the claims have already been issued by their national patent office in a parallel application, together with instructions to file those claims at the EPO. This mutual "misunderstanding" has its roots in the provisions of the notorious Article 123 of the European Patent Convention (EPC), whose second paragraph requires that the subject matter is supported by the content of the original application, whereas the third paragraph prohibits the scope of protection of an issued patent being extended during opposition proceedings.
  • Digital piracy has long been a headline issue for the IP community, but only recently has it been thrust upon the public. Ingrid Hering reports
  • The full, unedited, interview with Marshall Phelps, covering his role at IBM, software patenting and many other topics.