Retired judges criticise the AIA How to share a trade mark The PTAB pitches for your work Chief Administrative Patent Judge James D Smith One of the most popular sessions at this year's AIPLA annual meeting involved three retired patent judges debating the merits of the America Invents Act. The session was so packed that the roughly 1,000 attendees overflowed into the hallways. The panel included former Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Paul Michel, former Administrative Patent Law Judge on the USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Judge Nancy Linck, and Judge Joseph Farnan, who retired from the US District Court for the District of Delaware. All three judges were frank in their criticism of the America Invents Act, which Farnan said includes "eye wash, feel-good" remedies for the courts. "This Act is a lot about reining in certain types of patentees, but it doesn't take a broad brush to reforming the system," said Farnan. "In district courts, it's going to be a lot more litigation and confusion," he added.