Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,021 results that match your search.22,021 results
  • WIPO is planning to open five new offices around the world next year one each in China, Russia and the United States and two in Africa.
  • In September, Finland will become the first Nordic country to have a specialised IP court. Petri Rinkinen and Kim Parviainen explain how it will work
  • Recent amendments will encourage brand owners to register trade marks in Lithuania more responsibly, put them to genuine use and defend them more actively, explain Ruta Pumputiene and Jurgita Randakeviciute
  • Trade secrets are an increasingly important part of a company’s IP portfolio. But IP owners need to ensure their secrets are afforded maximum protection. Michael Warnecke explains how they should do it
  • Last month, the Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit urged district courts to do more to tackle frivolous patent litigation. Vernon M Winters explains what measures are available, and how they can be used better
  • Patrick Sands and Thor North explain the most important changes for patent filers brought about by Australia’s Raising the Bar amendment
  • The Chinese Supreme Court recently published the list of top 10 IP litigation cases of 2012. One selected case is the final judgment decided by the Zhejiang High Court regarding the patent infringement litigation between Holley Communicates and Shenzhen Samsung Kejian Mobile Communication.
  • Filing a Belgian patent application presents several major advantages to applicants. Indeed, filing a Belgian patent application only involves the payment of a very low filing fee (€50) and a search fee (€300), these two fees being sufficient to obtain, after only a formal examination, a granted Belgian patent within two or three years of the filing date. This means that an invention may be protected on the Belgian territory in a short time and at a low cost.
  • On March 8 2013, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued a notice to its examiners regarding the examination of computer-implemented inventions for determining patent-eligible subject matter. This notice follows the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Amazon.com Inc relating to the patentability of business and computer implemented methods, which resulted in the grant of Amazon.com's one-click patent in January 2012.
  • On May 14 2013 the General Court dismissed the appeal against the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM rejecting a trade mark application for the word fluege.de, under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) CTMR. The application was for services for "advertising, business management, business administration, office functions, transport, packaging and storage of goods, travel arrangement, services for providing foods and drink, accommodation services" in classes 35, 39 and 43.