Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,099 results that match your search.22,099 results
  • The Presidential Council on Intellectual Property (PCIP) is leading discussion about integrating the patent litigation system in Korea. The discussion stems from the criticism of the current bifurcated patent litigation system; in particular, that the bifurcated system has adversely affected expertise in courts and resulted in delays in proceedings.
  • Double patenting is a ground of revocation of a Singapore patent. Under section 80(1)(g) of the Singapore Patents Act, a patent may be revoked if it "is one of 2 or more patents for the same invention having the same priority date and filed by the same party or his successor in title". Notably, the wording of section 80(1)(g) is directed to "priority date" which means that two or more patents may be considered the same invention as long as they claim the same priority date, even if the priority claims relate to different applications.
  • Read reports and see photos from this year's US Patent Forum in Washington DC, thanks to Twitter and Storify
  • It is not common that the IP story unravelsin sequels; however sometimes it has to happen. The December 2013/January 2014 issue of Managing IP carried an article which paid tribute to Gagarin's daughter who protected her right to the name of her father. The judgment of the IP Court obliged the Patent Office to cancel the controversial mark. The Patent Office and the applicant (Gagarin entertainment centre) appealed the judgment of the IP court.
  • The IP Code of the Philippines defines a mark as "any visible sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of an enterprise". This definition is broad enough to include any indication that can be seen, including a facade of a building. The IP Code provides an enumeration of marks are not registrable making the criteria of distinctiveness as the main standard for registrability.
  • Search warrants used to raid the home of Kim Dotcom were valid despite their deficiencies, the New Zealand Court of Appeal has held.
  • In a previous briefing, we reported a case where a Dutch interlocutory judge qualified the trade mark Popstars as a well-known unregistered trade mark in the sense of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention.
  • Border measures are always a key tool in the fight against counterfeiting and piracy and a critical element of a successful IP enforcement system. In the scope of the continuous efforts to create competent border enforcement measures and to provide effective protection, the Customs in Algeria, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia and UAE (three emirates out of seven: Dubai, Sharjah and Ras Al Khaimah) have established a trade mark recordation system for registered marks. Recordal is also expected to be introduced in Qatar and in an additional UAE emirate (Abu Dhabi). This system will undoubtedly help Customs officials target, intercept and confiscate shipments of infringing goods.
  • The computing industry in Mexico has increased substantially in the past 10 years. There is a great number of developments in areas such as hardware, software, video games, computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), computer-aided engineering (CAE) and computer-aided surgery (CAS).
  • Japanese practice, under which late pharmacological test results are rarely accepted, has been criticised by foreign pharmaceutical companies for being in discord with western practice and making it difficult to pursue a global IP strategy. Recently, the IP High Court warned against too strict examination by the JPO and rendered a judgment that should promote international harmonisation.