INTA 2022: Licence deals are changing and counsel must adapt

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

INTA 2022: Licence deals are changing and counsel must adapt

Jessica Cardon at YMF Carpet (left) and Tom Lingard at Stevens & Bolton

Speakers from UL, YMF Carpet, Full Sail IP and Stevens & Bolton delved into the evolving dynamics and legal considerations behind brand partnerships

The dynamics behind brand partnerships are changing rapidly, speakers pointed out at the INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC today, May 2.

Counsel at YMF Carpet, UL, Full Sail IP and Stevens & Bolton said in their session called ‘The Modern Innovative Licence: Creative Monetization Strategies for your Brand’ that the change had largely been driven by emerging partner and consumer expectations.

Jessica Cardon, general counsel at YMF Carpet in Connecticut, pointed out that celebrities and influencers, for example, increasingly wanted their own views incorporated into brand and marketing strategies.

“We worked with one person who was vegan and strongly believed in animal rights who wanted the the fragrances produced to be vegan and PETA certified,” she said.

“The people you partner with will want to impose their beliefs on you and you must work out how that will work in terms of consumer relationships.”

Sanjana Sharma, associate general counsel at UL in Chicago, added that celebrities had also started to tap into how to leverage their own statuses and extend the monetisation of their personal brands beyond what they might otherwise have enjoyed.

As a result, these celebrities are becoming much more sophisticated in their brand partnership negotiations. “They are aware of how they add value in respect to marketing and social media and they will negotiate with you to pay higher royalty rates,” she said.

Legal and business thinking

To adapt to these changing circumstances, counsel should keep a few legal and business considerations in mind, said the speakers.

Tom Lingard, partner at Stevens & Bolton in the UK, said it was important to conduct due diligence.

“You need to make sure you have the right partners, make a risk assessment and ensure you have a plan if something goes wrong. Do you have a morality clause in your contract, for example?”

Sharma agreed, likening brand partnerships to relationships and marriages. “Some of these relationships go the distance but others don’t and there needs to be something in place to terminate them in those instances,” she said.

Lingard added: “You need a prenup.”

Alan Kravetz, CEO of Full Sail IP in Connecticut, added that strategic research was also critical. He pointed out that the collaboration between French fashion house Balenciaga and The Simpsons was so successful – despite seeming like an odd team up – because of research.

“These collaborations might seem like odd matches, but they’re extremely well researched and really project creativity in a wonderful way.”

Final pointers

Speakers finished their session with one key takeaway each.

Kravetz said it was important to look towards future developments so not to accidentally give away tomorrow’s developments today.

“Imagine you’d made a deal related to wired phones just before the cell phone really exploded,” he said.

Cardon said licensing required strategic planning and that it was important to expand into categories that were natural extensions of the business.

Sharma added that it was vital for counsel to pick partners carefully. “You should choose nimble and experienced partners with as much care as you might choose a spouse,” she said.

Lingard reiterated that it was important to consider exit strategies early on.

The INTA Annual Meeting is being held this week at the Walter E Washington Convention Center in Washington DC.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article