Kathi Vidal confirmed as USPTO director; will focus on pro-bono

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Kathi Vidal confirmed as USPTO director; will focus on pro-bono

Kathi Vidal, the USPTO's new director

The Winston & Strawn managing partner and litigator was confirmed by the Senate in a voice vote after more than a year with no director

Kathi Vidal was confirmed as USPTO director by the Senate last night, April 5, in a voice vote.

Now she has been confirmed, Vidal will likely focus on broadening pro-bono programmes at the USPTO, according to office sources.

One source said Vidal highlighted her desire to make this subject one of her priorities during pre-confirmation meetings at the office.

Such a focus would be in-keeping with her record as a private practice lawyer. Vidal was very involved with Winston & Strawn’s pro-bono efforts.

Vidal, a patent litigator and managing partner at Winston & Strawn in California, will come into her new role after more than a year with no nominated USPTO director.

Former director Andrei Iancu stepped down from the role in January 2021. Drew Hirshfeld, the USPTO’s patent commissioner, has been performing the duties and functions of the director since then, essentially serving as an acting director.

Some intellectual property stakeholders were jubilant at the announcement. The Innovation Alliance’s executive director Brian Pomper said: “As a leading patent attorney and intellectual property expert, Ms Vidal brings the kind of experience we need at the USPTO.

“We also believe she has the leadership qualities required to be a successful, even-handed USPTO director.”

Several counsel told Managing IP last year that while Vidal’s nomination was still a rumour, they were desperate to get a new director after such a long time without one.

“Even if someone landed the role who you didn’t agree with, at least you’d know where the office was going and could plan appropriately,” said a head of IP policy at an R&D company.

Vidal was confirmed by the Senate’s Judiciary Committee, along with Leonard Stark for a judgeship at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in January. Stark was confirmed by the full Senate earlier this year.

Before that, the committee grilled the patent litigator on matters related to Section 101, standard essential patents, the Fintiv rule at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and drug pricing.

Vidal was nominated by President Joe Biden on October 26 2021, 10 months after the last director left the role.

In the past, she has spoken to Managing IP about Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the District Court for the Western District of Texas.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Value-added services give in-house counsel the satisfaction that they are getting more value for money, while law firms get the opportunity to win more work
A team at Boies Schiller Flexner is advising shoe company Kizik and parent company HandsFree Labs in the dispute
Nokia’s latest enforcement actions against Geely and Transsion joining Via LA’s AAC pool were also among the top talking points
Benjamin Kelly, the firm’s fifth IP partner hire in a little over one year, has experience in patent and trade secret disputes involving complex technologies
Half-year Talent Tracker data shows Pierson Ferdinand was among the most prolific hirers in the US, while in Europe, there has been a notable UPC swing
Exclusive data reveals in-house counsel want external legal advisers to build better client relationships and add value beyond routine work
Brett Sandford acted for Perplexity AI, which fended off the threat of a preliminary injunction to launch an AI-powered web browser
Stephen Yang joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to explain why his role requires him to wear many hats
The complaint follows a declaratory ruling issued by the England and Wales High Court last month that said Samsung is entitled to an interim licence
Tobias Hahn explains how the firm's multi-jurisdictional setup enabled it to secure an injunction on behalf of Fujifilm relating to defendant Kodak’s non-UPC activity
Gift this article