Breaking: Ed Sheeran wins ‘Shape of You’ copyright trial

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Breaking: Ed Sheeran wins ‘Shape of You’ copyright trial

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The England and Wales High Court found ‘compelling evidence’ that ‘Shape of You’ did not infringe a songwriter’s earlier work

Ed Sheeran has won a copyright infringement trial centring on his 2017 hit ‘Shape of You’, the England and Wales High Court ruled this morning, April 6.

In the judgment, His Honour Justice Antony Zacaroli said there was “compelling evidence” that Sheeran’s ‘Shape of You’ originated from sources other than the song he was accused of copying.

Singer-songwriter Sheeran was facing accusations that ‘Shape of You’ copied aspects from ‘Oh Why’, a 2015 song written by Sami Chokri and Ross O’Donoghue, performed by Chokri under the alias Sami Switch. Sheeran denied copyright infringement.

The portion of ‘Shape of You’ questioned was the ‘oh I’ hook, which was alleged to be strikingly similar to an ‘oh why’ refrain in Switch’s work.

‘Shape of You’ is one of Sheeran’s most successful tracks and was number one in the singles charts of 34 countries.

In court last month, Andrew Sutcliffe QC, a barrister at 3VB in London acting for Chokri and O’Donoghue, described Sheeran as “an obsessive music squirrel” who “borrows ideas” from other artists.

But handing down judgment this morning, Zacaroli said that although there are similarities between the tracks, this threshold is “only a starting point” to a successful infringement claim.

To prove infringement under UK copyright law, it must be shown that a defendant likely had access to the allegedly infringed work and that a substantial portion must have been copied.

One of Switch’s arguments was that Sheeran must have encountered the song, as it appeared on well-known YouTube channel SBTV, of which Sheeran is a fan. Switch also noted that he had targeted Sheeran on Twitter in the hope of sparking interest in his work.

But Zacaroli said the evidence put forward to prove access was “no more than speculative” and found it was likely Sheeran had not heard ‘Oh I’.

In 2017, Sheeran faced a separate copyright allegation, which centred on another of his songs called ‘Photograph’. That case settled the same year.

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
The managing partner gave up an equity partnership track in New York to build a practice in India. More than a decade later, she discusses entrepreneurship, leadership, and why women should not wait before taking the next step
Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
Gift this article