Customs key to big-fish counterfeiters: 3M counsel
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Customs key to big-fish counterfeiters: 3M counsel

Sponsored by

incopro.png
sebastian-pena-lambarri-abj-zuko6mg-unsplash.jpg

Hosted by Managing IP’s Ed Conlon, the discussion at Incopro’s Insync Virtual Summit explored how the pandemic has affected brand protection teams and offered key insights to drive success in 2021

The chief trademark counsel at 3M told an industry conference last month that brand owners must work closely with customs officials to reel in big-fish counterfeiters.

Colette Durst was speaking on a panel at Incopro’s Insync Virtual Summit on Thursday, January 28, alongside Jennifer Ehrlich, a strategic communications leader at 3M.

Durst, whom Managing IP also interviewed in late January, told the conference that brands should be prepared to do more with less in 2021 as budgets remain tight.

It came as a poll during the panel showed that nearly 50% of respondents have a smaller budget than at this time last year, while 34% said theirs had not changed. A further 19% said their budget has actually increased.

Durst and Ehrlich were reliving events from a year in which 3M’s workload has increased hugely. The company, which specialises in worker safety and healthcare, was put on the COVID frontline in early 2020 as demand for its N95 respirators soared.

At the same time, 3M witnessed a surge in trademark infringement, counterfeiting and fraud, particularly online. It responded by taking legal action and boosting communicating efforts, with 3M’s related in-house teams joining forces.

The IP team has also worked with law enforcement to stamp out counterfeiters, and Durst praised officials as “incredibly collaborative”. She said 3M will continue its work with the authorities, especially on large-sized cases.

3M has also used online and customs enforcement to make it harder for counterfeiters to get counterfeit respirators delivered to consumers. 

For the “big fish”, as she put it, Durst recommended using customs to block goods from entering a country and using the shipment data to track down the offenders. “That has been incredibly helpful,” she said.

Durst added that 3M is continuing to look at how else it can identify the big fish, including by using technology tools, even as the IP team does more with less in 2021.

For further examples of 3M’s communication efforts, please see: www.3m.com/covidfraud

To learn more about the panel, which was hosted by Managing IP’s managing editor Ed Conlon, please see the recording on the Insync website.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article