The launch of Horizon Europe: The EU initiative for research and innovation
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The launch of Horizon Europe: The EU initiative for research and innovation

Sponsored by

maiwald-logo-cropped.PNG
gerblur.png

Marco Stief of Maiwald takes a closer look at the key elements of the scientific research initiative that succeeded the Horizon 2020 framework programme

January 1 2021 saw the launch of the world's largest single funding programme for research and innovation, Horizon Europe. The initiative has a budget of around €95.5 billion (approximately $116.3 billion) for the programme period from 2021 to 2027.

New features in Horizon Europe 2020, as compared to its predecessor programme, include: the institutionalisation of the European Innovation Council (EIC), as well as the introduction of strategic planning processes and topic-driven missions. The purpose of the revised programme is to foster and protect a knowledge-driven, innovation-friendly society, and to develop a globally competitive and environmentally sustainable economy.




Eligible for funding are legal entities established in an EU member state or in an associated country. Under the terms of the partnership agreement concluded between the EU and the UK on December 24 2020, the UK is also deemed to be an associated country.



Potential project partners have the possibility to enter into a pre-contractual agreement while their application is still pending. The reason here is to avoid knowledge drain during the application phase, especially in the event that funding is later refused.



Where there is a grant agreement in place between the European Commission and the project partners, the latter must also enter into a ‘consortium agreement’ for the duration of the project. This is limited in time to the duration of the research project and must implement or comply with the requirements of the grant agreement, as well as the provisions of respective national law.



It is clearly understood that the use, processing or other exploitation of results play an integral role in the joint research project. Article 16 of the Corporate Model Grant Agreement of May 14 2020 provides that existing know-how must be disclosed in order for new knowledge and insights to be derived from it. The results should also be capable of being exploited commercially by the project partners. Accordingly, Article 16.4 in conjunction with Annex 5 provides for the establishment of rights of access to ‘background’ and ‘results’, if certain conditions are met. Moreover, the European Commission must have access to research results without payment where such access is necessary for the implementation or monitoring of EU programmes or policies.



Where there is any ambiguity surrounding the ownership of results generated by the project, barring any prior written agreements to the contrary, all project participants will acquire co-ownership of the innovations in question. In practice, however, it may be advisable to make specific alternative contractual arrangements in order to allow a commercial exploitation that takes account of a party’s particular interests.



To achieve the European Commission's overriding objective of exploiting the results of the funded projects to boost innovation and competitiveness in Europe, the project partners are expected to create suitable framework conditions for third parties. With this in mind, the project partners are meant to use their ‘best efforts’ to exploit the results. Wide dissemination of the results gained from the project also ranks high and, barring any restrictions to the contrary, each project partner must disseminate its results in a publicly available format.



Particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the creation of new perspectives and opportunities for strengthening the European Research Area (ERA) and encouraging innovation acquires new significance. It will be interesting to observe how the innovations that are expected to flow from Horizon Europe will play out in this context.





Marco Stief

Partner, Maiwald

E: stief@maiwald.eu



more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article