Cooperation between enforcement authorities boosts anti-counterfeiting efforts

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Cooperation between enforcement authorities boosts anti-counterfeiting efforts

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png
Real and fake conceptual

In view of its very large territory, Brazil has always faced many challenges implementing a successful anti-counterfeiting programme. Lack of a uniform approach and the absence of a political will to tackle IP infringements on a large scale were some of the problems that held IP owners back in the past.

However, a few recent developments have changed this landscape.

Adding to the standard surveillance activities at the harbours, the Federal Revenue has been expanding its enforcement activities by conducting raid actions in what are called secondary zones. These are raids against distributors on the streets. As an example, a massive raid prior to Brazilian Children's Day in October led to the seizure of 300,000 products in three states.

Moreover, we are now seeing an increased cooperation between enforcement authorities on a national and international level.

Firstly, the cooperation between the Federal Revenue, state police and city halls has enabled the development of joint raids in major cities like São Paulo. Such raids have led to the seizure of hundreds of tons of counterfeit products over the last couple of years and even to the closure of massive distributors.

In another recent joint effort, enforcement authorities from Brazil, the United States and Great Britain coordinated a massive operation against illegal streaming services in Brazil. Raids took place in 10 different Brazilian states, leading to 252 blocked websites and 65 removed apps.

Finally, after several years of political paralysis, the National Anti-counterfeiting Council (CNCP) which is a governmental department belonging to the Ministry of Justice dedicated to anti-counterfeiting regulation has restarted its activities and launched a couple of best practice guides aimed at challenging online IP infringements.

Consolidation of a national anti-counterfeiting policy is still a work in progress. However, the combination of recent efforts has had a positive effect in dismantling crime organisations behind counterfeiting and is turning Brazil into a safer environment for IP owners and consumers.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
The managing partner gave up an equity partnership track in New York to build a practice in India. More than a decade later, she discusses entrepreneurship, leadership, and why women should not wait before taking the next step
Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
Gift this article