The 50 most influential people in IP 2020

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The 50 most influential people in IP 2020

mip-50-banner-600x400px.png

Managing IP reveals its pick of the top people driving intellectual property law, policy and business this year

The list is in five categories, which you can access individually by clicking the links below. A profile of each person featured can be found in these sections, along with links to separate interviews for some. The full list of names is at the end of each section. 

The categories:

20 industry leaders >

9 public officials >

8 judges >

7 IP authorities >

6 notable individuals >

Despite the coronavirus pandemic – and in several instances, because of it – there have been a lot of important developments in the intellectual property world this year.

Several courts ruled that standard essential patents could be licensed at the end-product level. Companies opened their IP portfolios to spur COVID-related innovation. Firms dumped racially charged brands. IP judges experimented with virtual hearings and trials – and they worked well.

The events of this year will undoubtedly go on to shape IP law, policy and business for the foreseeable future – and we felt it was important to recognise the people who drove this change, or made a significant contribution to it in some way.

This year’s list of the 50 most influential people in IP features an array of political figures, judges, in-house counsel, IP office leaders and notable figures from all walks of life across Europe, North America and Asia.

Without giving it away, the list includes a judge who wrote the book on virtual trials in a North American country, a public official who nearly derailed Europe’s chances of a harmonised patent system, and two in-house lawyers who were in seventh heaven after a high court copyright win.

It is worth noting that anyone whose main job involves working for a law firm was not eligible for the list; they are rated and ranked in many other places (including IP STARS).

The names were picked by Managing IP’s journalists with some assistance from our readers. The list is not intended as a definitive ranking, but rather the start of a debate, so we have simply organised the top 50 into five categories and then in alphabetical order.

Congratulations to those who featured this year! If you would like to compare this year’s list to 2019’s, click here to see last year’s list.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Managing IP speaks with up-and-coming women lawyers at five law firms about fighting imposter syndrome, maintaining work-life balance and why real representation matters
Kilpatrick’s managing partner for San Francisco discusses taking the longer route to partnership, the importance of female mentors, and strengthening office culture
Home-working and grace periods at IP offices have been announced, while Managing IP understands Iran’s IP office is out of service
With INTA 2026 just two months away, London-based IP practitioners offer tips on making the most out of the city
New platform, which covers SEPs for the Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7 standards, includes 10 patent owners
The Texas-based IP litigation hires take King & Spalding’s partner appointments from pre-merger Winston & Strawn up to 12 this year
Sunny Su explains how her team overcame challenges with orchard evidence collection to secure a favourable plant variety decision from China’s top court
Flexible working firm continues trajectory from 2025 with appointment of Matthew Grant and Letao Qin
Anousha Davies, associate and trademark attorney at Birketts, unpicks how the university’s reputation enabled it to see off a proposed trademark for ‘Cambridge Rowing’
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article