Updates on the patent maintenance system in Mexico

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Updates on the patent maintenance system in Mexico

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
File Folder Labeled as Patents.

For a long time, the Mexican Industrial Property Law remained static. However, in the last years, the law has been amended, having an impact on the lifespan of design registrations. Furthermore, due to the recent international commitments of our country, a new law has been approved further modifying the patent maintenance system.

On 2018, the amendments to the law modified the length of protection for design registrations. Before the amendments, design registrations were protected for 15 years. The amendments modified this by providing a first period of protection of five years which could be renewed four times, giving a total length of protection of 25 years. The amendments also applied to pending design registration applications and registrations already granted.

The new Law for Industrial Property Protection, which will come in force in the final months of 2020 maintains the aforementioned amendments and also provides an increment in the time of protection for utility models, which has changed from a previous 10-year lifetime to a new 15-year period of protection.

Finally, the new law follows the recent international commitments made by our country, and includes the possibility of a complementary certificate which aims to adjust the time of protection of a granted patent when the Mexican Patent Office determines that there was unreasonable delay in the prosecution of the patent. The regulation for the new law is still awaiting publishing, and the details for the granting of complementary certificates is a completely new practice in our country, therefore, further details on this matter will be clarified in the following months.

In conclusion, we consider that the changes concerning the period of protection for inventions in our country are very positive and will be an advantage for our patent system and ultimately for the owners of patents in our country.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Kevin Mack, Via’s new president, emphasises the importance of collaborative licensing structures and shares how AI tools can help create new lines of business
A Tokyo District Court ruling concerning movie spoilers, and a second chance for VLSI against Intel were also among the top talking points
Practitioners believe new AI tools at the USPTO will not replace lawyers or disrupt revenue, but instead expose where a trademark attorney’s value lies
Leighton Cassidy Legal hopes to leverage its founder's international experience and provide clients with a rare chance to receive litigation and prosecution under one umbrella
Gift this article