Auto counsel give tips on IP department integration

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Auto counsel give tips on IP department integration

adobestock-174950452.jpg

At this year’s Autolex forum, IP counsel at Honda, Uber, Bosch and AGC Automotive revealed how they add the most value within their businesses

With the advancement and use of technologies such as 5G and artificial intelligence, intellectual property is becoming more important to automotive companies – and it’s vital, therefore, that IP departments take a more central and integrated role in their businesses.

At Managing IP’s Autolex forum last week, in-house counsel revealed that the best way to achieve that integration is to treat the legal and IP departments as customer service functions.

“Firstand foremost, the legal department really is a customer service function that’s there to service the business,” said Chris Storm, legal director of emerging technologies at Uber in Pennsylvania. “I’m a big believer in that if you provide good experience and customer service to the rest of the teams in your company, that’s how you get repeat customers.”

He added that being a good customer service function can be challenging at Uber because the businesses hires from many different industries, and each one has a different expectation of how legal should engage and be involved.

“It is very different hiring from automotive or aerospace than it is from tech and app development,” he said. “You’ve got some clients who want legal to get out of the way, want to launch products quickly and are not used to that kind of oversight, and some who are used to legal being more involved.

“How do you create a tailored service for these different teams to give them the level of support they need but also the level of support they expect? It’s a balancing act.”

Business enablers

Daniel Warsh, legal counsel at Bosch in Detroit, added his perspective. He argued that attorneys are risk communicators – but that this function can give lawyers a bad reputation if it’s not balanced with a drive to find solutions too.

“People might think that we’re a cost and not adding value, and that we’re really just there to spoil the fun,” he said.

“We have to understand what our clients and customers are looking for. They’re not looking for us to tell them that they can’t do something – they’re looking for solutions and for us to come to them and offer alternative solutions when a particular course of action might not be viable.”

He added that it’s important for legal and IP departments to shed the mentality of being ‘no people’, and start proactively finding ways to convince their non-legal colleagues that they’re there to help them do business in a compliant and legal way.

That mindset change can be spurred by the department’s physical proximity to the business’s engineers. Mark Duell, senior corporate counsel for Honda in Ohio, pointed out that his firm has demonstrated a commitment to IP by creating a specialist unit that is separate and distinct from its legal department.

That unit is based in the research and development facility in North America, which gives it unparalleled access to the engineers.

“They can feel free to come to us with their IP issues directly,” he noted.

“That access that we have helps to make sure that we can get everything covered that we need to cover. You might not be able to put the whole legal department in the R&D facility, but you can certainly put your IP lawyers there because it’s really helpful.”

Reaching out

One panellist was keen to point out that while IP departments should act as a customer service function, that shouldn’t lead lawyers to sit around and wait for requests.

Eric Rogers, IP counsel and market strategy leader at AGC Automotive in Detroit, said: “All too often, legal departments can get a bit complacent and just act as a receiver department. They receive requests, turn the wheel, and then the output goes back to the group or customer that requested it.

“But that can be inefficient because you’re not so well connected to the business or the other groups you are serving. Perhaps you don’t know the background issues. So just because you’re a customer service function, don’t let that stop you from being an outreach agent.”

He added that counsel should work to understand what the business’s goals are and sit in on some of the departmental meetings, including product development, R&D and marketing, to help them really understand their colleagues’ day-to-day issues.

“That can help improve efficiency because you don’t have to take all that time and educate yourselves on every discreet issue.

“People might be hesitant to reach out if they know that when they send off a request to legal, they might get some feedback that misses some critical business points.

“As such, building those relationships can really help with the willingness of those groups to come to legal.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In other news, Ericsson sought a declaratory judgment against Acer and Netflix filed a cease-and-desist letter against ByteDance over AI misuse
As trade secret filings rise due to AI development and economic espionage concerns, firms are relying on proactive counselling to help clients navigate disputes
IP firm leaders share why they remain positive in the face of falling patent applications from US filers, and how they are meeting a rising demand from China
The power of DEI to swing IP pitches is welcome, but why does it have to be left so late?
Mathew Lucas has joined Pearce IP after spending more than 25 years at Qantm IP-owned firm Davies Collison Cave
Exclusive survey data reveals a generally lax in-house attitude towards DEI, but pitches have been known to turn on a final diversity question
Managing IP will host a ceremony in London on May 1 to reveal the winners
Abigail Wise shares her unusual pathway into the profession, from failing A-levels to becoming Lewis Silkin’s first female IP partner
There are some impressive AI tools available for trademark lawyers, but law firm leaders say humans can still outthink the bots
Lawyers at Simmons & Simmons look ahead to a UK Supreme Court hearing in which the court will consider whether English courts can determine FRAND terms when the licence is offered by an intermediary rather than an SEP owner
Gift this article