Interview: WIPO’s Gurry hits out at ‘fake news’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Interview: WIPO’s Gurry hits out at ‘fake news’

gurry-image-600-min.jpg

Addressing past allegations, the departing WIPO chief says those making accusations should be more accountable

Francis Gurry, the director general of WIPO, has hit back at previous allegations made against him, insisting that people who make accusations and the media that report them should face greater scrutiny. 

Gurry, who departs WIPO in September after 12 years in office, was speaking to Managing IP in what could be his last major media interview as DG.

The Australian made headlines after he was accused in 2014 of being involved in the illicit taking of some workers’ DNA and interfering in a procurement process.

A subsequent report by the UN’s Office of Internal Oversight Services – the full version of which was not made publicly available – found that there was no evidence that Gurry was involved in any DNA scandal. However, it did find that he directly influenced the giving of a WIPO contract.

In two separate matters, the UN Sanctions Committee found that Gurry did not violate UN resolutions by providing technical assistance to Iran and North Korea.

Gurry insists there is a duty on the media to report such findings, particularly if outlets have covered the initial allegations. 

Speaking about the DNA findings, Gurry claims: “There was very little [media] reporting on the conclusions. The report found one sentence: ‘There is absolutely no evidence to support these allegations.’

“What do you want me to do?” he asks.

Gurry adds: “You have certain people running around saying this, that and the other, but what’s the responsibility of someone who makes this accusation and which results in a six or 12 month process from which there is nothing found?

“We all know that one of the fundamental problems is ‘fake news’ and the integrity of information. Anyone can put anything out there, and I see that as one of our biggest problems. I don’t think we have fully come to terms with this.”

In a wide-ranging interview, Gurry also discusses:

·       The growth of Chinese and Asian IP filings;

·       Coronavirus and IP rights;

·       Artificial intelligence and IP; and

·       A look back over his time in office

The full interview will be published on Managing IP next week.




more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article