Podcast: Novartis, ML&P and ex-GSK counsel on COVID pools

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Podcast: Novartis, ML&P and ex-GSK counsel on COVID pools

re-podcast-logo.png

Guests debate how patent pools could be used to ensure global access to COVID treatments and vaccines, as well as how the pandemic has changed the IP system


To listen to the podcast, which is nearly 50 minutes, click the link below.

For the first Managing IP podcast, Charlotte Kilpatrick and IP experts discussed the ramifications of the COVID-19 crisis on the patent system and how the virus could change how pharma innovators conduct research and collaborate.

A highlight was a debate on the role patent pools could play to accelerate research for COVID treatments and vaccines. Ellen 't Hoen, director of the Medicines Law and Policy research institute in the Netherlands, stressed the importance for pharma innovators to use patent pools as a way to ensure global access to the vaccines once they become available. She pointed to the example of the Medicines Patent Pool, which negotiates licences for HIV and tuberculosis medications with generics companies, which can produce treatments at an affordable cost for developing countries.

David Rosenberg, former vice president of IP policy at GSK, agreed that a patent pool could be one solution among many to ensure access, but added he doesn’t believe a pool will be the ideal way for companies to conduct business and that innovators are more confident to negotiate with generics companies they already know. 

Corey Salsberg, vice president and global head of IP affairs at Novartis in Washington DC, noted that because tackling COVID-19 could involve multiple vaccines as well as treatments for those with advanced symptoms, a single patent pool might not be the best solution to ensure access.

Enjoy the podcast. 








more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Law firms are integrating AI to remain competitive, and some are noticing an impact on traditional training and billing models
Gift this article