Survey: In-house counsel on the US patent landscape

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Survey: In-house counsel on the US patent landscape

surveyfinalcover.jpg

Fifty four in-house counsel took our survey on how the US patent pendulum has moved and how the courts and the USPTO have changed

Change to the US patent landscape has been controversial. What one lawyer thinks is a common-sense measure to cut down on bad patents, another might consider a disaster designed to kill innovation in an industry.

As IP in-house counsel consider how legislative reforms, courts conducting hearings remotely because of COVID-19, and the 2020 presidential elections will affect their IP strategies, we wanted to understand how they felt about the state of the US patent landscape.

The 54 in-house lawyers who took our survey weighed in on Andrei Iancu’s appointment to director of the USPTO, the PTAB and where the patent pendulum is swinging.

Section one: Broad concerns

In part one, more lawyers thought President Donald Trump’s views on IP were better for their business than those of the Democratic Party’s Joe Biden, but the majority of respondents said either that they ‘didn’t know’ whose IP views among the two men would be better for their businesses or that neither’s were. And while most counsel said the US is not too patent friendly, they were divided on how the pendulum is swinging. Read more here.

Section two: The courts

In part two, respondents said that they wanted to see more remote hearings in the future and that Delaware was their preferred court to litigate in. Read more here.

Section three: The USPTO

In part three, a large majority of respondents said director Iancu was doing a good job, but there was no clear consensus on the PTAB. Read more here.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A $110 million US verdict against Apple and an appellate order staying a $39 million trademark infringement finding against Amazon were also among the top talking points
Attorneys are watching how AI affects trademark registrations and whether a SCOTUS ruling from last year will have broader free speech implications
Patent lawyers explain why they will be keeping an eye on the implications of a pharma case and on changes at the USPTO in the second half of 2025
The insensitive reaction to a UK politician crying on TV proves we have a long way to go before we can say we are tackling workplace wellbeing
Adrian Percer says he was impressed by the firm’s work on billion-dollar cases as well as its culture
In our latest interview with women IP leaders, Catherine Bonner at Murgitroyd discusses technology, training, and teaching
Developments included an update in the VAR dispute between Ballinno and UEFA, the latest CMS updates, and a swathe of market moves
The LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards is thrilled to present the 2025 shortlist
A new order has brought the total security awarded to a Canadian tech company to $45 million, the highest-ever by an Indian court in an IP case
Andrew Blattman reflects on how IP practices have changed and shares his hopes for increased AI use and better performance on the stock market
Gift this article