Carpmaels & Ransford takes UPC initiative

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Carpmaels & Ransford takes UPC initiative

The UK patent and trade mark attorney firm Carpmaels & Ransford is adding a team of litigators in preparation for the launch of the Unified Patent Court

ian-kirby-1.jpg

The firm announced today that it has hired partners Ian Kirby (pictured) and Jonathan Day from Arnold & Porter's London office.

Kirby, a patent litigator, has already joined the firm. Day, a solicitor and trade mark attorney, joins on September 22.

Managing IP understands that a third solicitor, specialising in life sciences, is also expected to join the firm soon.

The move comes ahead of the launch of the EU Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court, expected in 2016.

Hugh Goodfellow, the firm's head of life sciences, told Managing IP: "With the launch of the Unitary Patent and UPC, we believe these additions will enable us to offer clients a comprehensive IP service."

Historically, there has been a clear divide in the UK between firms of patent and trade mark attorneys and firms of solicitors, who often referred work to each other.

However, in recent years this has broken down as patent firms such as Marks & Clerk and HGF have set up associated litigation practices, and others such as D Young and EIP have added solicitors. Going in the other direction, some law firms such as Olswang have hired patent attorneys.

Carpmaels' initiative goes further than some other firms as it is understood that all the new members will have equal status to the existing partners, and be part of the same firm.

It comes as many European firms are evaluating how best to advise clients on the UPC, including whether they need to add expertise or new offices.

"As patent attorneys we are very experienced in opposition work, which we think will prepare us well for UPC proceedings. Adding solicitors gives us extra experience in for example evidence gathering and witness preparation, but most importantly of all, for the strategic insights which only come from years of experience conducting litigation across Europe," said Goodfellow.

He added that the new hires are part of a long-term strategy: "We expect that we will make further additions in the future as the UPC develops."

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Yossi Sivan explains how Israeli judgment is a pro-brand owner departure from the norm and why it sends a strong message that corporate structures are not always a shield
Halim Shehadeh, group CEO of IP firm CWB, says that in the rush to discuss what AI can do, IP firms are overlooking the more important question of whether they are ready
Caitlin Heard, who formally joined the firm from CMS last month, says she is excited by the ‘energy’ of the London office
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article