Who's up, who's down - the EPO reveals its filing figures

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Who's up, who's down - the EPO reveals its filing figures

patent-filings-45.jpg

Patent filings at the EPO have continued their steady upwards growth, with the Office reporting the fourth consecutive year of highest-ever patent filing figures

filings20small.jpg

The EPO received 266,000 patent applications last year, up 2.8% on 2012. It granted 66, 700 European patents, which was 1.6% more than in 2012 and the highest number ever.

Applicants from the EPO’s 38 member states made up just over one-third of patent filers at the Office, a figure unchanged from last year. Of non-EPO country applicants, those from Asia continue to file growing numbers of applications. Those from China were up more than 16% and those from Korea up 14% on the year before.

The figures present a mixed picture for innovation within Europe. Of the big filing nations, applications from the Netherlands soared by 17%, with figures from Denmark up 7% and Sweden up 7.5%). From a rather smaller base, filings from Portugal and Turkey grew by around one-third, from the Czech Republic by one-quarter and from Ireland by almost 10%.

Filings from Belgium, Germany, the UK, Italy, Switzerland and Spain fell in 2013, however, with falls ranging from 7.4% (Belgium) to 1% (Spain).

With 2,883 applicants, Samsung easily beat its nearest patent filing rival (Siemens, with 1,974 applications) into second place. Philips, LG and BASF took the next three spots.

In nine of the 10 top technical fields, applicants from Europe filed the greatest numbers of applications with the EPO, which the Office said reflected Europe’s “balanced and wide-ranging patent portfolio”. European companies took over the top spot from US applicants in the field of medical technology, while the computing category was dominated by the US, which filed more than one-third of applications. Japan was strong in electrical machinery (with 25% of the EPO’s applications) and transport (22%), but China led in digital communication (15%).

The full data is contained in the EPO's Annual Report.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article