Hong Kong IPD head to step down

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong IPD head to step down

Peter Cheung, the director of the Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department, will retire in mid-May

Petr Cheung

Peter Cheung

Cheung has been at the helm of HKIPD since April 2011, where he was previously deputy director. Throughout his tenure, he has been actively pushing to develop Hong Kong as a centre for IP trading, arguing that the city’s strong rule of law, proximity to China and well-developed financial services make it an ideal location for intellectual property deal-making.

Cheung also headed HKIPD as it began to implement one of the biggest changes to Hong Kong’s patent system. Last year, the city announced that it will develop a new patent right that includes substantive examination. Hong Kong has issued patents under a system where applications are not substantively examined but are granted by recording a patent published by SIPO, the UK IP Office or the EPO for European patents designated for the UK. The overhaul would keep the recordal system but also add the substantive examination option as well.

As the director of HKIPD, Cheung has played an important role in implementing this change. Late last year, HKIPD issued a notice of tender requesting private sector firms to submit bids to act as consultants to the project. The results of the tender have not yet been announced.

HKIPD has confirmed that Cheung will be stepping down, though a spokesperson declined to state who will replace him. Another source suggested that deputy director Ada Leung is the leading candidate for the role, though two others are under consideration as well.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article