Is Weatherley's world too black and white?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Is Weatherley's world too black and white?

Last week saw the publication of a report on copyright education (and the need for more of it) by the UK prime minister's IP adviser. But is its good guys/bad guys approach too simplistic?

weatherley-report.jpg

The report by Mike Weatherley MP (pictured right, centre) was the third (and final, since he will leave Parliament in 2015) he has prepared for David Cameron.

Despite being appointed to the (upaid) role of intellectual property adviser, each report has focused on copyright. That is not surprising, since it is an area of IP the former music industry executive knows very well. But has the insight he has gained as an industry insider made him too willing to defend industry practices from the challenges unleashed by the digital revolution?

In a piece Weatherley wrote last week for Conservative Party blog Conservative Home, the IP adviser talked about a recent visit he had paid to a university. While there, he had asked the students present how many had illegally downloaded music in the past month. Around 90% admitted they had.

Weatherley then asked how many of these people "thought that they were helping to contribute to the downfall of our creative industries" - a loaded question if ever there was one. One third of the students kept their hands raised.

Weatherley concluded from this experiment (which he acknowledges was not very scientific) that "(a) that third just didn't care about the consequences, and that (b) the other two-thirds hadn't thought through the consequences".

But this surely amounts to what academics would call a false dichotomy. There may be another explanation: some students may have thought that they were supporting the band and the industry that goes with it. They may have known that the money they subsequently spent on tickets to see the band live, or for a T shirt, or for the entire album that they bought after hearing one track, would contribute towards the upkeep of the creative industries.

Of course it is important to acknowledge the positive impact that IP has for developed economies, and the disruption that the internet has caused the creative industries (not least publishing). But it is seems worth acknowledging that the young people who cut their technological and creative teeth making mashups and parodying successful artists, or who can now access more forms of music than they could ever afford to buy, might yet be the next generation's world-leading artists.

Weatherly has agreed to an interview with Managing IP before he leaves office, so we look forward to discussing these questions with him.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article