Singapore designated PCT international search authority

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Singapore designated PCT international search authority

Singapore and WIPO have entered into an agreement to designate the IP Office of Singapore (IPOS) a PCT international search authority

IPOS will be the fifth Asia-based international searching authority (ISA) and the first in Southeast Asia. It is expected to be running by early next year.

The other Asian ISAs are in China, Japan, Korea and India. The JPO is the second most popular ISA in the PCT system with an estimated 20.7% of all international searches in 2013, while the Korean Intellectual Property Office is third with 14.8%. The EPO is the most popular office in the world for PCT international searches with 37.7% of all searches.

Singapore will be one of several new ISAs to go live in the last two years. Israel’s patent office started performing international searches in 2012, generating 360 international search reports in 2012 and an estimated 816 in 2013. The Indian (est 107 reports) and Egyptian (est 13 reports) patent offices also became active as ISAs last year.

Singapore has made several changes in the last few years in response to the globalising market. In 2012, it amended its laws to allow foreign qualified patent agents located in Singapore to draft patents for other jurisdictions without having to meet local registration requirements. At the same time, Singapore also became a positive grant patent regime and as part of that process developed its own in-house patent examination capacity.

This new agreement to become a PCT ISA appears to be another step in the process, specifically with an eye toward China. According to a press release issued by the IP Office of Singapore, about 25% of its examiners can conduct prior art searches in Chinese.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article