Being smart about global brand development

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Being smart about global brand development

In an increasingly globalized marketplace, companies need to learn to pick their battles and conserve their resources. That’s the message from yesterday’s panel, The Essentials of Managing a Worldwide Trademark Portfolio Companies.

Companies often instinctively feel the need to secure the maximum level of protection for all of their brands. However, Denise Yee of Visa International says that brand development requires a nuanced approach.

“At Visa, it seems like every client wants to name everything, all the time. And sometimes it makes sense, but a lot of times, for a particular service, it may not need a special name,” Yee explains.

Instead, she says that when discussing with partner companies about a new service, the first question is whether it needs a name at all. Several factors need to be considered, such as the product’s expected shelf life and whether there is will be significant marketing behind it. Other considerations include how many countries the product will be deployed in, whether the targeted audience is aimed at general consumers or other financial institutions.

Daniel Zohny of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) also stresses the need for a considered approach to brand protection. FIFA has its brands divided into several types, including the FIFA brand itself and the trophy.

There are also the event-related brands, such as logos, slogans and mascots for specific tournaments such as the 2014 FIFA World Cup. In this category, the size of the tournament also helps to determine the brand protection strategy. For example, while marks associated with the World Cup will be registered in many jurisdictions, for a smaller event such as an under-17 tournament, the brand protection will be focused on perhaps just on the host country.

Thomas Zutic of DLA Piper gave the outside counsel’s perspective. He says one of his main objectives to obtain strong protection for his client’s core trademarks.

“Many times, there will be tons of sub-brands, so you really got to make sure that you understand what is the core brand, what are the core marks and make sure that you are putting the appropriate resources behind that and not for something that’s just a one-time thing for three months,” he says.

In the end, building a brand is about careful weighing of a mark’s value. Even the Visa brand, judged by some to be the ninth most valuable in the world, does not indiscriminately register for the sake of getting a mark.

“We put a lot of thought into what we file, if we file at all.” Yee explains.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
Gift this article