In oral arguments in the Nautilus v Biosog case on Monday, several Supreme Court justices took issue with the Federal Circuit’s ruling that ambiguity in a patent is permissible unless a court finds the claim is “insolubly ambiguous”. Alli Pyrah takes a look at the history of the phrase and why the justices seem so sceptical about it
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way