What do in-house counsel think about the Unitary Patent & UPC?
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

What do in-house counsel think about the Unitary Patent & UPC?

There are many questions that remain to be answered about Europe’s pending Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court. But perhaps some of the most important, and also most difficult, are: who will use it? What will make them want to use it? And what will scare them off?

munich-skyline2.jpg

Munich - home of the EPO and the Oktoberfest

Hopefully two forums we are hosting next month will address these questions. The panels and audience will include in-house counsel from various countries and industries, and they will be able to share their hopes and expectations on the new system.

The forums take place in two of the three locations for the central division of the UPC: the first is in Munich on September 9 and the second in Paris on September 11.

Among the speakers confirmed for both events are:

  • Jochen Meyer, head of IPR Germany at Vodafone

  • Simon Roberts, director of patents, BT

  • Jürgen Schneider, vice president, global IP & IP litigation, QIAGEN

  • Mathilde Rauline, head of European patent litigation, Sanofi

  • Richard Vary and Clemens Heusch, global head of litigation and head of European litigation, Nokia

  • Colette Vogele, director of IP policy, Microsoft

  • Michael Fröhlich, senior director, EU IP & strategy, BlackBerry

We also have judicial perspectives from Eskil Waage of the EPO (in Munich) and Tilmann Büttner of the Düsseldorf Court (in Paris).


Lively debates expected

paris-skyline2.jpg

Will the Eiffel Tower benefit from Paris's status as the home of the UPC central division?

In addition to the Unitary Patent and UPC, the forums will also feature sessions on related issues such as the role of the CJEU and the Swiss IP court.

With many companies having offices or headquarters near these two cities, we expect some interesting debates between speakers and audience on the merits of the proposed systems, and how much they will be used.

Although important questions remain to be addressed (notably about costs, who the judges are and the final rules of procedure) my impression is that many patent owners are more favourably disposed towards the new system than its critics would suggest.

That hunch was confirmed by a recent poll conducted by law firm Allen & Overy, which found that 49% of European patent managers would definitely opt in at least some of their patents to the UPC, and only 15% said they would definitely opt out some.

Meanwhile, it’s increasingly clear when you speak to patent specialists in Europe (particularly litigators) that firms are thinking hard about how to prepare for the changes. That includes by making appropriate hires, opening/expanding offices in the key locations and discussing mergers or alliances with other firms.

Time to prepare

The Unitary Patent and UPC proposals certainly do not please everyone, and they may not work perfectly to begin with, but most practitioners believe they are now going to happen – probably within the next two years – and that applicants (and third parties) need to start preparing now.

Our September events provide an opportunity to see if that is the case, and find out the latest thinking. Do come along if you can.

Attendance is free for in-house counsel, IP managers, R&D professionals and academics. All other Managing IP subscribers can take advantage of a 25% discount. Just quote: MIP25.

For more information or to register, please click here or contact Alicia Sprott: registrations@managingip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A majority of clients – particularly high-earning businesses – want advisers with demonstrable social credentials, according to a survey of more than 28,000 corporate counsel
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Warner Chappell Music v Nealy is a boost for certain copyright plaintiffs, but some counsel wonder if the court addressed the right question
Private equity firm Adamantem Capital leads the race to acquire Australia-based intellectual property business Qantm IP
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel at four firms reveal how they supervise associates on pro bono matters and what kind of volunteer work their attorneys do
Kramer Levin litigators explain how they secured victory for their client against Microsoft subsidiary Activision in a dispute concerning the video game ‘Call of Duty’
Steven Cooper, partner at Ware Fressola Maguire & Barber, explains what sponsoring Brand Action means for his firm and why the IP community is well-placed to help
Tilman Müller-Stoy reveals why he never made it as a footballer and how he could have had an alternative career as a fire juggler
As the UPC approaches its first anniversary, there’s a risk that persisting teething issues will continue to be the major pain points
Justin Davidson and Stanley Ng of Norton Rose Fulbright discuss what China’s recent Ultraman ruling does and doesn’t say about who is responsible when an AI system infringes copyright
Gift this article