China-based private investigators receive prison terms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

China-based private investigators receive prison terms

Peter Humphrey and Yu Yingzeng, the China-based investigators hired by GlaxoSmithKline to investigate corruption allegations, have been sentenced to 30 months and 24 months respectively for illegally obtaining private information

In a one-day trial, the Shanghai Intermediate Number One Court found that the British Humphrey (right) and Yu, his American wife, broke the law by illegally obtaining private information in the course of their investigations. In addition to the jail sentences, Humphrey received a RMB 200,000 fine ($32,500), while Yu was fined RMB 150,000. Humphrey will also be deported.

Humphrey and Yu have 10 days to appeal.

Donald Clarke of the Chinese Law Prof Blog has a copy of the Chinese language transcript posted by the court.

Humphrey and Yu are the founders of the private investigation firm ChinaWhys. In April 2013, GlaxoSmithKline hired the firm to investigate an anonymous email alleging that GSK employees were engaging in an elaborate bribery scheme. The detailed allegations also contained a video of GSK China head Mark Reilly in what appeared to be his Shanghai apartment.

In July 2013 Chinese authorities arrested Humphrey and Yu. Humphrey soon after issued an apology on Chinese television for his company's actions and said that he never intended to break Chinese law. GSK also admitted that its China-based executives had engaged in illegal activities.

The ChinaWhys case has been closely watched by international companies, as many regularly rely on private investigators to conduct due diligence on investments, business partners and other aspects of its business. This is especially true in IP enforcement, where companies often engage investigators to track down the sources of counterfeit goods.





more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article