China’s trade mark office computer system “basically” restored

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China’s trade mark office computer system “basically” restored

Problems that arose during an upgrade to computer systems, which have resulted in months-long delays of several key functions, are “basically” fixed, says China’s Trademark Office (TMO)

The upgrade, which began in mid-April of this year, ran into what the TMO described in an August notice as “serious technical malfunction”. According to the notice, the technical problems affected systems supporting automated functions in the registration system, and as a result, the processing of applications as well as hearings.

The SAIC issued another notice last week, noting that the Chinese Trademark Office’s (TMO) system has “basically” been restored and upgraded. According to Troy Rice of Simone IP Services in Hong Kong, the newer system offers several improvements, such as more frequently updated records, though it appears that there are still have some problems to iron out.

“Though…the records are being updated more regularly - the prior data set (that is, not recent and new filings) now has more than the usual amount of errors, mostly relating to status of the marks,” he says. “Registered marks show up as invalid, invalid marks show up as still pending - it’s best not to trust the results you get on the public portal, and there’s a need to have the TMO examiners do internal searches to have any comfort that search results are accurate.”

The technical problems also caused a delay in some of the other functions, such as issuances of receipts, application refusals and opposition decisions. Since last week’s announcement, the system appears to be functioning, though it may not be at full capacity. For example, while Rice notes that he is beginning to see filing receipts, refusals and other documents coming from the TMO and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB), Paul Schmidt of Jun He Law Offices in Beijing says that he has not received any such documents.

“So far we haven’t seen a change in [the TMO’s or TRAB’s] behaviour,” said Schmidt. “A lot of the functions that we normally rely upon haven’t been available.”

“Business has certainly been affected, but I hope that it will all be back to normal soon.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Yossi Sivan explains how Israeli judgment is a pro-brand owner departure from the norm and why it sends a strong message that corporate structures are not always a shield
Halim Shehadeh, group CEO of IP firm CWB, says that in the rush to discuss what AI can do, IP firms are overlooking the more important question of whether they are ready
Caitlin Heard, who formally joined the firm from CMS last month, says she is excited by the ‘energy’ of the London office
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article