China’s trade mark office computer system “basically” restored

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China’s trade mark office computer system “basically” restored

Problems that arose during an upgrade to computer systems, which have resulted in months-long delays of several key functions, are “basically” fixed, says China’s Trademark Office (TMO)

The upgrade, which began in mid-April of this year, ran into what the TMO described in an August notice as “serious technical malfunction”. According to the notice, the technical problems affected systems supporting automated functions in the registration system, and as a result, the processing of applications as well as hearings.

The SAIC issued another notice last week, noting that the Chinese Trademark Office’s (TMO) system has “basically” been restored and upgraded. According to Troy Rice of Simone IP Services in Hong Kong, the newer system offers several improvements, such as more frequently updated records, though it appears that there are still have some problems to iron out.

“Though…the records are being updated more regularly - the prior data set (that is, not recent and new filings) now has more than the usual amount of errors, mostly relating to status of the marks,” he says. “Registered marks show up as invalid, invalid marks show up as still pending - it’s best not to trust the results you get on the public portal, and there’s a need to have the TMO examiners do internal searches to have any comfort that search results are accurate.”

The technical problems also caused a delay in some of the other functions, such as issuances of receipts, application refusals and opposition decisions. Since last week’s announcement, the system appears to be functioning, though it may not be at full capacity. For example, while Rice notes that he is beginning to see filing receipts, refusals and other documents coming from the TMO and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB), Paul Schmidt of Jun He Law Offices in Beijing says that he has not received any such documents.

“So far we haven’t seen a change in [the TMO’s or TRAB’s] behaviour,” said Schmidt. “A lot of the functions that we normally rely upon haven’t been available.”

“Business has certainly been affected, but I hope that it will all be back to normal soon.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorney Oran Friar and trainee attorney Harry Cunliffe at Reddie & Grose, share that patent filings for clinical LLMs are surging, but success in the UK and Europe hinges on demonstrating technical innovation
Implementers can use the UK courts to seek FRAND terms for patent pool licences
The first credible UPC spinouts are growing, and they are coming from elite patent litigation teams, suggesting specialist litigators may no longer need large platforms to compete
Voyage IP has hired a veteran IP leader from Spruson & Ferguson as its head of trademarks, as well as another consultant who will boost the firm’s commercial offering
Lawyers say unwritten appearance expectations can disproportionately affect women and junior talent, making proactive guidance a growing responsibility for law firm leaders
Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Gift this article