In-house counsel on the need for more patent reform

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

In-house counsel on the need for more patent reform

In-house lawyers disagreed last week about the need for more reform of patent laws to tackle litigation from so-called patent trolls

Mary Huser

Speaking at the International Women’s Leadership Forum in San Jose last week, Mary Huser, general counsel, BlackBerry Technology Solutions (pictured, right of picture with Alexis Garcha), claimed there was a fatigue within the legal profession caused by having to deal with high numbers of lawsuits filed by non-practising entities.

“Last year was a watershed for the explosion of NPE activity. Maybe there was some nugget in some cases but most were completely frivolous,” she said.

Huser said that the America Invents Act (AIA) had provided operating companies with more tools to fight back, including new rules on fighting patent validity before the PTAB.

“Many NPEs are public companies that need to present quarterly reports just like any other company. The threat of a two-to-three-year delay is a real threat. The AIA presents a practical tool. If we can show prior art, the potential level of damages exposure and so on, and lay it out at the start, if we tell them we will go to the PTO and litigate for a few years – then that presents a nice little leverage for settling early.”

The downside of such an approach, said Huser, is the risk that the plaintiff will file amended claims: a risk that must be assessed strategically.

But while she welcomed the impact of parts of the AIA, she argued that courts must be more proactive in tackling frivolous litigation.

“I have encouraged judges to develop local rules to deal with the administration of cases. There has to be a real motion to dismiss stage. That would ensure that non-meritorious cases would not go forward.”

But Alexis Garcha, senior IP litigation counsel at Nokia, told the audience that there are important reasons for protecting innovation.

While she acknowledged that some people now no longer regard Nokia as an operating company, after it sold its handset business to Microsoft last year, she said that the company still has valuable intellectual property.

“I am wary of too much patent reform, Garcha said. “Patent aggregators actually have a value. Frivolous patent suits are an abuse but we don’t want to prevent everyone from enforcing their patents.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Benoit Geurts and Coreena Brinck will help the firm ‘accelerate its innovation agenda’, according to its managing partner
News of a trademark row over Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ and Nokia’s expansion of its IoT licensing programme were also among the top talking points
IP attorneys share how the Cox v Sony ruling impacts their counselling strategies, and if the case could influence how courts may assess liability for AI platforms
Gift this article