Authors Guild appeals against Google Books decision

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Authors Guild appeals against Google Books decision

The Author’s Guild has appealed to the Second Circuit against a federal judge’s decision to dismiss its copyright infringement claim against Google Books

As expected, the trade association has filed a notice to appeal the November 14 decision by Judge Denny Chin which found the mass book-scanning project permissible under the fair use exemption.

Following an eight-year legal dispute, Chin ruled that Google Books provides “significant public benefits” and “enhances book sales to the benefit of copyright holders.”

“It advances the progress of the arts and sciences, while maintaining respectful consideration for the rights of authors and other creative individuals, and without adversely impacting the rights of copyright holders,” Judge Chin wrote in his ruling. “Indeed, all society benefits.”

Shortly after the decision, Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild, said in a statement that his organisation would appeal the judgment, which he described as a “fundamental challenge” to copyright.

Google scanned over 20 million works for the project. The Author’s Guild is also appealing an October 2012 decision which ruled that the libraries which supplied the books to Google were also protected by fair use. The guild sued the libraries in a separate lawsuit, Authors Guild v Hathitrust.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article