AIPLA attacks USPTO sequestration

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AIPLA attacks USPTO sequestration

AIPLA president Jeff Lewis has written to the Office of Management and Budget protesting against the application of sequestration to the USPTO

The letter, sent on Tuesday to OMB director Sylvia Mathews Burwell, claims that applying sequestration will significantly reduce the USPTO’s funding at a critical stage in the implementation of the AIA.

Lewis, speaking on behalf of AIPLA’s 15,000 members, noted that the USPTO depends entirely on user fee collections to fund its services.

“It is vitally important for the USPTO to have full access to all its fee collections, to be able to do the best job possible to help secure and maintain our intellectual property system as a key economic driver to attract and protect investment in new technology.”

He said that recent progress in reducing the backlog of applications, which has partly been achieved by hiring more examiners, developing new IT systems and establishing more effective administrative processes, is likely to be undermined by the confiscation of USPTO funds.

“Any delay in these improvements represents a major step back from the commitment of the Administration to the AIA and a fundamental challenge to the innovation and job creation these improvements represent.”

Under former USPTO director David Kappos, who left the organisation in January after resigning from his post in November, the backlog was reduced by 20% despite a 5% average annual increase in patent applications. Over the last two years of his administration, Kappos increased the number of patent examiners by 30% to over 8,000.

Following the departure of Kappos, the USPTO is now being led by acting director Teresa Stanek Rea.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article