Next steps on Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Next steps on Madrid Protocol

sign-45.jpg

INTA President Toe Su Aung yesterday signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Miguel Angel Margain Gonzalez, Director General of the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), with INTA agreeing to help Mexico with the implementation of the Madrid Protocol.

The Protocol entered into force in Mexico in February this year. Yesterday Margain, as well as representatives of the Colombian and New Zealand offices, spoke to the INTA Daily News about the international trademark system.

sign-300.jpg

Colombia deposited its instrument of accession in May 2012 and the Protocol entered into force in August last year. Jose Luis Londono Fernandez, Deputy for Industrial Property in Colombia’s Superintendency of Industrial Property, said that the first International Application based on a Colombian registration was filed last week: “We are on the map now. Our key objective going forward is that the Madrid Protocol should be used by domestic companies. We will do a seminar about it in July in three of the main industrial cities in Colombia.”

Since the Protocol entered into force in Mexico, there have been at least 12 international applications filed by national applicants, and the country has been designated in about 100 international applications.

“We had to implement some changes to the law to accommodate the Madrid Protocol. For example, we are a single class country—we didn’t have multi-class applications. Our data system had to include the Madrid system applications,” said Margain. “We don’t have a trademark opposition system, but that’s not a requirement to be part of the Madrid Protocol. We are talking to the industry associations about whether an opposition system is needed,” he added.

Since joining the System in October last year, New Zealand has been designated about 1,400 times and some 100 applicants have used the country as the basis for an international application. Ingrid Bayliss, National Manager of New Zealand’s Intellectual Property Office, said the system has been popular with domestic applicants, including small businesses, as it also covers most of New Zealand’s main trading partners, such as Australia, China and the United States.

She added that the Office used accession as an opportunity to update its IT systems. It now has a 100% online case management system, which is compulsory for applicants. “This has enabled us to cut a number of costs from the Office, and we have passed those savings on to applicants,” said Bayliss.

Margáin said Mexico is following a similar path: “The Madrid Protocol has also helped us to build the e-filing system. By 2014, we will have the whole process available electronically.”

Global Brand Database

Find out more about the Madrid Protocol and the Global Brand Database at WIPO’s booth in the Exhibition Hall. The Database includes records of more than 11 million marks from 10 offices, including the United States and WIPO. Enhancements, including a link with OHIM’s TMview database, are expected to be added soon. Glenn Macstravic, Head of the Brand Data Base Unit at WIPO, said he welcomed feedback from users at the Annual Meeting: “Don’t be afraid to come and tell us what we can do better to help you.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article