Alcatel had claimed that shopping websites Newegg and Overstock infringed the patents, which covered functions including rescaling a website as the user resizes the browser window.
In 2011, Alcatel sued Newegg and Overstock, along with other companies including Amazon, Intuit, Kmart, Lands’ End, QVC, Sears and Zappos. All the defendants except Newegg and Overstock settled before the trial.
Newegg and Overstock fought the lawsuit, and a jury in the Eastern District of Texas ruled the patents were invalid.
Alcatel Lucent appealed, but on Wednesday the Federal Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision on Alcatel-Lucent v Overstock and Newegg without comment.
Newegg’s chief legal officer, Lee Cheng, issued a statement which said: “To date, we have invalidated four e-commerce patents that have been used to extract hundreds of millions of dollars in protection money. We believe that fighting patent trolls is the right thing to do. Our customers, at least, don’t have to subsidize costs to trolls.”
Newegg was represented in the appeal by a team led by Ed Reines of Weil Gotshal & Manges, Overstock was represented by Bracewell & Giuliani and Alcatel was represented by Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
The material on this site is for law firms, companies and other IP specialists. It is for information only. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Notice before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2020 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. For help please see our FAQs.