The dispute concerned Monsanto’s Roundup Ready genetically modified seed and is the latest case to address patent exhaustion in the United States.
Justice Kagan delivered the opinion, which was published on May 13. She said: “In the case at hand, Bowman planted Monsanto’s patented soybeans solely to make and market replicas of them, thus depriving the company of the reward patent law provides for the sale of each article. Patent exhaustion provides no haven for that conduct.”
But she also said that the holding was “limited”: “We recognize that such inventions are becoming ever more prevalent, complex, and diverse. In another case, the article’s self-replication might occur outside the purchaser’s control. Or it might be a necessary but incidental step in using the item for another purpose.”
The Court’s decision was expected following the oral hearing, and the submission of the US government.
Oral arguments were heard in February. Farmer Hugh Bowman was represented by Mark Walters of Frommer Lawrence & Haug, while Monsanto was represented by Seth Waxman of WilmerHale.
Amicus briefs were submitted by Knowledge Ecology International, the Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association, the American Antitrust Institute, Public Patent Foundation, and the Center for Food Safety and Save Our Seeds.
The material on this site is for law firms, companies and other IP specialists. It is for information only. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Notice before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2020 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. For help please see our FAQs.